W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org > July to September 2001

Re: comments on current xml dsig draft

From: Joseph M. Reagle Jr. <reagle@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2001 09:44:19 -0400
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20010703093133.00badd60@localhost>
To: "Dournaee, Blake" <bdournaee@rsasecurity.com>
Cc: w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org, "'ilanzohar@yahoo.com'" <ilanzohar@yahoo.com>
At 23:53 7/2/2001, Dournaee, Blake wrote:
>the number of <Reference> elements in <SignedInfo>. Shouldn't one run of
>C14N be enough to canonicalize the signed info?

Yes, that is the intent. I've tweaked [1] to express this intent better.

[1] 
http://www.w3.org/Signature/Drafts/xmldsig-core/Overview.html#sec-CoreValidation
$Revision: 1.91 $ on $Date: 2001/07/03 13:43:49 $ by $Author: reagle $




--
Joseph Reagle Jr.                 http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/
W3C Policy Analyst                mailto:reagle@w3.org
IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair   http://www.w3.org/Signature
W3C XML Encryption Chair          http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/
Received on Tuesday, 3 July 2001 09:44:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:21:36 UTC