W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org > July to September 2001

Re: Base64

From: Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 18:20:59 -0400
To: merlin <merlin@baltimore.ie>, "Gregor Karlinger" <gregor.karlinger@iaik.at>
Cc: "XMLSigWG" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
Message-Id: <01081518205904.22543@policy>
On Tuesday 07 August 2001 04:58, merlin wrote:
> As far as I (possibly we) understand it, schema-normalized values are
> *not* exposed as part of the standard XML infoset (and thus probably
> not DOM), but as part of the post schema-validation infoset, which is
> an augmentation, not a replacement, of the XML infoset.

This is correct unless these values where specified via a default value in 
the schema content model.

> Also, there is a proposal that schema validation be an *explicit*
> transform, so the possibility of sender/recipient schema validation

Right, generally it won't be a problem, but since schema validation (in a few 
instances) could affect the serialized form, it should be considered a 
transform that is explicitly enumerated.
Received on Wednesday, 15 August 2001 18:20:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:21:36 UTC