W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org > July to September 2001

Re: Poll (Was: Question for Implementors (Was: Schema Validation Transform))

From: Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 18:45:55 -0400
To: 杉山 高弘 <t-sugiyama@da.jp.nec.com>, <kent@trl.ibm.co.jp>, <bal@microsoft.com>, <bdournaee@rsasecurity.com>, <harada@prs.cs.fujitsu.co.jp>, <Petteri.Stenius@done360.com>, "merlin" <merlin@baltimore.ie>, "Gregor Karlinger" <gregor.karlinger@iaik.at>
Cc: "Eastlake" <dee3@torque.pothole.com>, "XMLSigWG" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
Message-Id: <20010926224556.67B3E87400@policy.w3.org>
On Friday 21 September 2001 03:27, 杉山 高弘 wrote:
> We(NEC) select 1 in the following question.

If we retain 1 and wait to standardize it, I would want to see at least one 
other developer be very close to implementing them. Otherwise, I think it's 
safest to remove them to another spec.

> If the latest spec supports The Reference Processing Model in,
> it is necessary to Retain the sections [3] .

Why is that? 
Received on Wednesday, 26 September 2001 18:47:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:21:36 UTC