W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org > July to September 2001

Re: Question for Implementors (Was: Schema Validation Transform)

From: merlin <merlin@baltimore.ie>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 18:18:48 +0100
To: reagle@w3.org
Cc: XML Signature WG <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
Message-Id: <20010912171849.31DF643C0A@yog-sothoth.ie.baltimore.com>

Hi Joseph,

>Note, if the Signature is enveloped or enveloping, [XML] or [XML-schema] 
>validation of the document might introduce changes that break the 
>signature. Consequently, applications should be careful to consistently 
>process the document or refrain from using external contributions (e.g., 
>defaults and entities).

Good to me, but it matters more whether the Signature has
same-document references. Enveloped and enveloping are a
subset of the cases.


Baltimore Technologies plc will not be liable for direct,  special,  indirect 
or consequential  damages  arising  from  alteration of  the contents of this
message by a third party or as a result of any virus being passed on.

In addition, certain Marketing collateral may be added from time to time to
promote Baltimore Technologies products, services, Global e-Security or
appearance at trade shows and conferences.

This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept by
Baltimore MIMEsweeper for Content Security threats, including
computer viruses.
Received on Wednesday, 12 September 2001 13:19:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:21:36 UTC