- From: merlin <merlin@baltimore.ie>
- Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 18:18:48 +0100
- To: reagle@w3.org
- Cc: XML Signature WG <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
Hi Joseph, r/reagle@w3.org/2001.09.12/12:43:12 >Note, if the Signature is enveloped or enveloping, [XML] or [XML-schema] >validation of the document might introduce changes that break the >signature. Consequently, applications should be careful to consistently >process the document or refrain from using external contributions (e.g., >defaults and entities). Good to me, but it matters more whether the Signature has same-document references. Enveloped and enveloping are a subset of the cases. Merin ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Baltimore Technologies plc will not be liable for direct, special, indirect or consequential damages arising from alteration of the contents of this message by a third party or as a result of any virus being passed on. In addition, certain Marketing collateral may be added from time to time to promote Baltimore Technologies products, services, Global e-Security or appearance at trade shows and conferences. This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept by Baltimore MIMEsweeper for Content Security threats, including computer viruses. http://www.baltimore.com
Received on Wednesday, 12 September 2001 13:19:28 UTC