- From: Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 16:28:52 -0400
- To: dsig <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
- Cc: Eastlake <dee3@torque.pothole.com>, Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@Baltimore.com>
Given the noted immaturity [1,2] of the XML Schema validation transform that was included prior to PR, the absense of a transform for XML1.0 validation, and the lack of immediate plans for implementation and ability to do interop testing [3], the proposed text for XML validation transforms has been moved from the XML-DSIG [4] spec to a new document [5]. I spoke informally with TimBL (W3C Director) about this, and will add the advancement of this new document to Recommendation as a deliverable (along with Exclusive Canonicalization) during our next re-chartering. XML-DSIG *has* been clarified to state the default processing and serializaiton within the Transform processing model is well-formed and XML Canonicalization respectively. [6] [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-ietf-xmldsig/2001JulSep/0179.html [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-ietf-xmldsig/2001JulSep/0235.html [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-ietf-xmldsig/2001JulSep/0238.html [4] http://www.w3.org/Signature/Drafts/xmldsig-core/Overview.html [5] http://www.w3.org/Signature/Drafts/xmldsig-transform-xml-validation.html [6] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-ietf-xmldsig/2001JulSep/0256.html -- [[I will be on Holiday October 4-11 2001]] Joseph Reagle Jr. http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/ W3C Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair http://www.w3.org/Signature W3C XML Encryption Chair http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/
Received on Friday, 28 September 2001 16:29:25 UTC