public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org from June 2007 by author

Ben Adida

• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-28: following your nose to the RDFa specification (Friday, 29 June)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type (Thursday, 28 June)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type (Thursday, 28 June)
• Re: the Creative Commons take on @href everywhere (Thursday, 28 June)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type (Thursday, 28 June)
• Re: [RDFa TC] Review and Approval of XHTML Test Case partition (Thursday, 28 June)
• the Creative Commons take on @href everywhere (Wednesday, 27 June)
• Telecon Agenda - Thursday, 1500 UTC, 1100 Boston (Wednesday, 27 June)
• [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type (Wednesday, 27 June)
• [RDFa] ISSUE-1: reification (Wednesday, 27 June)
• [RDFa] Proposed resolutions to ISSUE-2, ISSUE-5, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-29, ISSUE-4 (Wednesday, 27 June)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-4: (local) bnode identifiers (Wednesday, 27 June)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-29: mime type of RDFa document (Wednesday, 27 June)
• Re: ISSUE-25: default datatype for literals (Wednesday, 27 June)
• RE: [RDFa] ISSUE-5 (Wednesday, 27 June)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-2: custom attributes for RDF shorthand, PROPOSAL for RESOLUTION (Wednesday, 27 June)
• An Update on RDFa Schedule and Docs (Tuesday, 26 June)
• Re: Validation Update: success! (Monday, 25 June)
• regrets for this week (Monday, 25 June)
• Re: Validation Update: success! (Monday, 25 June)
• Re: Validation Update: success! (Monday, 25 June)
• Re: Validation Update: success! (Friday, 22 June)
• Re: Blank nodes & classes (Friday, 22 June)
• Re: [Proposal] ISSUE-42: How does RDFa deal with @src (Thursday, 21 June)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-28: following your nose to the RDFa specification (Thursday, 21 June)
• Agenda Correction (Wednesday, 20 June)
• Telecon Agenda - Thursday, 21 June 2007, 1500 UTC (Wednesday, 20 June)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-5 (Wednesday, 20 June)
• Re: Validation Update: success! (Tuesday, 19 June)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-5 (Tuesday, 19 June)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-2: custom attributes for RDF shorthand (Tuesday, 19 June)
• [RDFa] ISSUE-4: (local) bnode identifiers (Tuesday, 19 June)
• [RDFa] ISSUE-29: mime type of RDFa document (Tuesday, 19 June)
• [RDFa] ISSUE-28: following your nose to the RDFa specification (Tuesday, 19 June)
• ISSUE-25: default datatype for literals (Monday, 18 June)
• [RDFa] ISSUE-5 (Monday, 18 June)
• [RDFa] ISSUE-2: custom attributes for RDF shorthand (Monday, 18 June)
• Re: LeeF's comments (again) (Friday, 15 June)
• LeeF's comments (again) (Wednesday, 13 June)
• RDFa Telecon - Thursday, 1500 UTC, 1100 Boston (Wednesday, 13 June)
• Validation Update: success! (Wednesday, 13 June)
• Re: Blank nodes & classes (Wednesday, 13 June)
• Re: Blank nodes & classes (Wednesday, 13 June)
• Re: Assuming no call, I send my regrets (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: Doubt about href attribute (Monday, 4 June)
• Re: Dumb Question (Friday, 1 June)

Christoph

• Violation of XHTML 1.0 (Sunday, 10 June)

Cédric Mesnage

• Re: Blank nodes & classes (Friday, 22 June)
• Re: Blank nodes & classes (Friday, 22 June)
• Re: Validation Update: success! (Friday, 22 June)
• Re: Blank nodes & classes (Friday, 22 June)
• [ANN] RDFa On Rails 0.0.8 (Tuesday, 19 June)

Dan Brickley

• Re: [Proposal] ISSUE-42: How does RDFa deal with @src (Friday, 22 June)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-29: mime type of RDFa document (Tuesday, 19 June)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-29: mime type of RDFa document (Tuesday, 19 June)
• Timecheck (Friday, 1 June)
• Re: Dumb Question (Friday, 1 June)

Dan Connolly

• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-28: following your nose to the RDFa specification (Friday, 29 June)
• Re: An Update on RDFa Schedule and Docs (Tuesday, 26 June)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-28: following your nose to the RDFa specification (Thursday, 21 June)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-29: mime type of RDFa document (Tuesday, 19 June)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-28: following your nose to the RDFa specification (Tuesday, 19 June)
• Re: Blank nodes & classes (Wednesday, 13 June)
• RE: Violation of XHTML 1.0 (Monday, 11 June)

Elias Torres

• Re: Dumb Question (Friday, 1 June)
• Re: Dumb Question (Friday, 1 June)

Fabien Gandon

• RDFa GRDDL profile and permanent URL (Saturday, 2 June)

Hausenblas, Michael

• RE: meeting record: 2007-06-28 RDFa Task Force (Friday, 29 June)
• RE: meeting record: 2007-06-28 RDFa Task Force (Thursday, 28 June)
• RE: Telecon Agenda - Thursday, 1500 UTC, 1100 Boston (Thursday, 28 June)
• [RDFa TC] RDFa Test Runner update (Thursday, 28 June)
• RE: [RDFa TC] Review and Approval of XHTML Test Case partition (Thursday, 28 June)
• [RDFa TC] Review and Approval of XHTML Test Case partition (Wednesday, 27 June)
• RE: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type (Wednesday, 27 June)
• RE: [RDFa] ISSUE-1: reification (Wednesday, 27 June)
• RDF features covered by RDFa (Monday, 25 June)
• RE: Agenda Correction (Thursday, 21 June)
• RE: [RDFa] ISSUE-5 (Tuesday, 19 June)
• [RDFa] Meeting record: 2007-06-14 RDF-in-XHTML telecon (Tuesday, 19 June)
• RE: Literals and turning off datatype/language (Thursday, 14 June)
• RE: Validation Update: success! (Thursday, 14 June)
• RE: Violation of XHTML 1.0 (Monday, 11 June)
• RE: Assuming no call, I send my regrets (Thursday, 7 June)
• RE: Dumb Question (Friday, 1 June)

Ivan Herman

• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type (Thursday, 28 June)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type (Thursday, 28 June)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type (Thursday, 28 June)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type (Thursday, 28 June)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-1: reification (Thursday, 28 June)
• Re: [Proposal] ISSUE-42: How does RDFa deal with @src (Friday, 22 June)
• Re: [Proposal] ISSUE-42: How does RDFa deal with @src (Friday, 22 June)
• Re: [Proposal] ISSUE-42: How does RDFa deal with @src (Friday, 22 June)
• Re: [Proposal] ISSUE-42: How does RDFa deal with @src (Friday, 22 June)
• Re: [Proposal] ISSUE-42: How does RDFa deal with @src (Friday, 22 June)
• Re: [Proposal] ISSUE-42: How does RDFa deal with @src (Thursday, 21 June)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-28: following your nose to the RDFa specification (Thursday, 21 June)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-5 (Wednesday, 20 June)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-29: mime type of RDFa document (Tuesday, 19 June)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-5 (Tuesday, 19 June)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-28: following your nose to the RDFa specification (Tuesday, 19 June)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-29: mime type of RDFa document (Tuesday, 19 June)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-4: (local) bnode identifiers (Tuesday, 19 June)
• Re: ISSUE-25: default datatype for literals (Tuesday, 19 June)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-2: custom attributes for RDF shorthand (Tuesday, 19 June)

Jeremy Carroll

• Re: GRDDL profile for RDF-A [NOT A FORMAL COMMENT] (Monday, 4 June)

Karl Dubost

• Re: Validation Update: success! (Tuesday, 19 June)
• Re: Dumb Question (Friday, 1 June)

Keith Alexander

• GRDDL, RDFa, and DTDs, Re: Validation Update: success! (Wednesday, 27 June)
• Re: Validation Update: success! (Tuesday, 26 June)
• Re: Validation Update: success! (Monday, 25 June)
• Re: Validation Update: success! (Monday, 25 June)
• Re: Validation Update: success! (Sunday, 24 June)
• Re: [Proposal] ISSUE-42: How does RDFa deal with @src (Friday, 22 June)

Lee Feigenbaum

• Re: LeeF's comments (again) (Thursday, 14 June)

Mark Birbeck

• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-28: following your nose to the RDFa specification (Saturday, 30 June)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type (Thursday, 28 June)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type (Thursday, 28 June)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type (Thursday, 28 June)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type (Thursday, 28 June)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type (Thursday, 28 June)
• Re: the Creative Commons take on @href everywhere (Thursday, 28 June)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type (Thursday, 28 June)
• RDFa at Kendra initiative (Wednesday, 27 June)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-1: reification (Wednesday, 27 June)
• Re: Blank nodes & classes (Friday, 22 June)
• Re: [Proposal] ISSUE-42: How does RDFa deal with @src (Friday, 22 June)
• Re: Blank nodes & classes (Friday, 22 June)
• Re: [Proposal] ISSUE-42: How does RDFa deal with @src (Friday, 22 June)
• Re: [Proposal] ISSUE-42: How does RDFa deal with @src (Friday, 22 June)
• Re: [Proposal] ISSUE-42: How does RDFa deal with @src (Friday, 22 June)
• Re: [Proposal] ISSUE-42: How does RDFa deal with @src (Thursday, 21 June)
• Re: [Proposal] ISSUE-42: How does RDFa deal with @src (Thursday, 21 June)
• [Proposal] ISSUE-42: How does RDFa deal with @src (Thursday, 21 June)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-28: following your nose to the RDFa specification (Thursday, 21 June)
• Re: Blank nodes & classes (Thursday, 21 June)
• Re: ISSUE-25: default datatype for literals (Thursday, 21 June)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-28: following your nose to the RDFa specification (Thursday, 21 June)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-28: following your nose to the RDFa specification (Thursday, 21 June)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-29: mime type of RDFa document (Thursday, 21 June)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-5 (Thursday, 21 June)
• Re: Agenda Correction (Thursday, 21 June)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-29: mime type of RDFa document (Tuesday, 19 June)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-2: custom attributes for RDF shorthand (Tuesday, 19 June)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-4: (local) bnode identifiers (Tuesday, 19 June)
• Re: Literals and turning off datatype/language (Thursday, 14 June)
• Re: Violation of XHTML 1.0 (Monday, 11 June)
• Re: Dumb Question (Friday, 1 June)
• Re: Timecheck (Friday, 1 June)

Misha Wolf

• News Architecture 1.0 officially adopted by the IPTC (Monday, 25 June)

Niklas Lindström

• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-1: reification (Wednesday, 27 June)
• Re: ISSUE-25: default datatype for literals (Tuesday, 19 June)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-5 (Tuesday, 19 June)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-2: custom attributes for RDF shorthand (Tuesday, 19 June)
• Re: Literals and turning off datatype/language (Thursday, 14 June)
• Re: Literals and turning off datatype/language (Thursday, 14 June)
• Literals and turning off datatype/language (Wednesday, 13 June)

Ralph R. Swick

• meeting record: 2007-06-28 RDFa Task Force (Thursday, 28 June)
• request for profile URI for RDFa (Tuesday, 26 June)
• meeting record: 2007-06-21 RDFa Telecon (Thursday, 21 June)
• at risk/regrets for 14 June (Wednesday, 13 June)

Shane McCarron

• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type (Wednesday, 27 June)
• Re: Validation Update: success! (Tuesday, 26 June)
• Re: Validation Update: success! (Tuesday, 26 June)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-29: mime type of RDFa document (Tuesday, 19 June)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-5 (Tuesday, 19 June)
• Re: Dumb Question (Friday, 1 June)

Simone Onofri

• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-4: (local) bnode identifiers (Wednesday, 27 June)
• Re: ISSUE-25: default datatype for literals (Wednesday, 27 June)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-29: mime type of RDFa document (Wednesday, 27 June)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-1: reification (Wednesday, 27 June)
• Regrets for this week (Wednesday, 20 June)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-28: following your nose to the RDFa specification (Tuesday, 19 June)
• Regrets again (Monday, 4 June)

Steven Pemberton

• Partial regrets (was Re: RDFa Telecon - Thursday, 1500 UTC, 1100 Boston) (Thursday, 14 June)
• Assuming no call, I send my regrets (Thursday, 7 June)

Last message date: Saturday, 30 June 2007 19:49:17 UTC