RE: [RDFa] ISSUE-1: reification

+1

Cheers,
	Michael

btw: also discussed in
http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/RDFa/RDFCoverage

----------------------------------------------------------
 Michael Hausenblas, MSc.
 Institute of Information Systems & Information Management
 JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH
  
 http://www.joanneum.at/iis/
----------------------------------------------------------
 

>-----Original Message-----
>From: public-swd-wg-request@w3.org 
>[mailto:public-swd-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Ben Adida
>Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 4:41 AM
>To: RDFa; SWD WG
>Subject: [RDFa] ISSUE-1: reification
>
>
>
>In our continuing effort to close issues, I want to bring up a few more
>for discussion. We will attempt to close these by end of next week.
>
>ISSUE-1
>http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/1
>
>This is about supporting reification. We had a proposal at some point
>[1], but at this point there seems to be a consensus to stay away from
>reification support, given that some don't even consider it part of the
>RDF specification.
>
>The current proposal on the table, then, is to not support reification.
>Please send +1 or disagreements ASAP!
>
>-Ben
>
>
>[1] 
>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2006Apr/0007
>
>