W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > June 2007

RE: [RDFa] ISSUE-5

From: Hausenblas, Michael <michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 16:23:20 +0200
Message-ID: <768DACDC356ED04EA1F1130F97D29852011C5121@RZJC2EX.jr1.local>
To: "Ben Adida" <ben@adida.net>
Cc: "RDFa" <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, "SWD WG" <public-swd-wg@w3.org>


>ISSUE-5 is on our list:
>http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/5
>
>This is about whether @REL/@REV/@PROPERTY should be CURIE only (QNames,
>most of the time), or CURIE/URI, like about. In other words, should we
>write:
>
><span property="dc:title">RDFa Specification</span>
>
>or
>
><span property="[dc:title]">RDFa Specification</span>
>
>
>Given that we have been writing all specs and implementations using the
>assumption that these are *only* CURIEs (no square brackets), I propose
>that we make these attributes CURIE only.

+1 for CURIE only 

Cheers,
	Michael

----------------------------------------------------------
 Michael Hausenblas, MSc.
 Institute of Information Systems & Information Management
 JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH
  
 http://www.joanneum.at/iis/
----------------------------------------------------------
Received on Tuesday, 19 June 2007 14:20:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:50:23 UTC