Re: [Proposal] ISSUE-42: How does RDFa deal with @src

Hi Ivan,

> B.t.w., I realized yesterday evening (under the shower, the best place
> for these things:-) that this is wrong.

:)

> The range of rdfs:seeAlso is
> defined to be rdf:Resource by the RDF Semantics, ie, it should not be
> used with a Literal as an object.

Right. That's why I was wondering if rdfs:seeAlso was a better choice
for @longdesc than dc:description, since @longdesc takes a URI. I'd
forgotten about rdfs:seeAlso until I saw your post.


> But there is also rdfs:comment, for
> example, that could be used instead of rdfs:label, so the original
> argument holds...

Sure...I think you are right that there are better choices than
rdfs:label. We just need to alight on one and go with it. (And I
assume that your comment is a +1 for the idea that @alt should
actually be represented in triples, even if we're not yet sure what
triples?)

Regards,

Mark

-- 
  Mark Birbeck, formsPlayer

  mark.birbeck@x-port.net | +44 (0) 20 7689 9232
  http://www.formsPlayer.com | http://internet-apps.blogspot.com

  standards. innovation.