Ben Adida wrote: > > Issue #28: > http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/28 > > DanC asked us: "how does one follow one's nose to the RDFa specification > from an HTML+RDFa document?" > > I propose that we respond to this question by pointing to the DTD > declaration we now recommend for XHTML1.1+RDFa documents. > > I also propose that we specify an official W3C profile for XHTML1.1+RDFa > which would include a GRDDL transformation for XHTML1.1+RDFa. We should > encourage publishers to use this profile when it's possible, though we > should not to developers of RDFa consumers that this profile may not > always be present, since RDFa is built for copy-and-pasted, widgets, etc... > > Thoughts? Comments? Remember, send a note even if you simply agree! > I have been advocating an official profile for a while. Ie, I agree. Ivan > -Ben > -- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead URL: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ PGP Key: http://www.cwi.nl/%7Eivan/AboutMe/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:15:05 GMT