Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-28: following your nose to the RDFa specification

Mark Birbeck wrote:
> Hi Ivan,
> 
> Just to be clear though, the proposal is that the profile is optional.
> Are you ok with that?
>

I think so... I do not see any argument against this:-)

I.


> Regards,
> 
> Mark
> 
> On 19/06/07, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Ben Adida wrote:
>> >
>> > Issue #28:
>> > http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/28
>> >
>> > DanC asked us: "how does one follow one's nose to the RDFa
>> specification
>> > from an HTML+RDFa document?"
>> >
>> > I propose that we respond to this question by pointing to the DTD
>> > declaration we now recommend for XHTML1.1+RDFa documents.
>> >
>> > I also propose that we specify an official W3C profile for
>> XHTML1.1+RDFa
>> > which would include a GRDDL transformation for XHTML1.1+RDFa. We should
>> > encourage publishers to use this profile when it's possible, though we
>> > should not to developers of RDFa consumers that this profile may not
>> > always be present, since RDFa is built for copy-and-pasted, widgets,
>> etc...
>> >
>> > Thoughts? Comments? Remember, send a note even if you simply agree!
>> >
>>
>> I have been advocating an official profile for a while. Ie, I agree.
>>
>> Ivan
>>
>> > -Ben
>> >
>>
>> -- 
>>
>> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
>> URL: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
>> PGP Key: http://www.cwi.nl/%7Eivan/AboutMe/pgpkey.html
>> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
>>
>>
> 
> 

-- 

Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
URL: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
PGP Key: http://www.cwi.nl/%7Eivan/AboutMe/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf