- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 10:10:32 +0200
- To: mark.birbeck@x-port.net
- CC: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>, RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, SWD WG <public-swd-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <46836CF8.2030705@w3.org>
+1 with both statements Ivan Mark Birbeck wrote: > > Hi Ben, > > No problem with this, but might need to pin down the detail of how we > do this. For example, by removing the ability to put <link> and <meta> > anywhere in the document (which we've discussed because many browsers > move those elements out of context and into <head>) we lose the > current technique for supporting reification anyway. > > So I guess what I'm saying is "+1 for removing 'link and meta > anywhere', and then "+1 for *not* reinstating reification with some > other syntax". > > Regards, > > Mark > > On 27/06/07, Ben Adida <ben@adida.net> wrote: >> >> >> In our continuing effort to close issues, I want to bring up a few more >> for discussion. We will attempt to close these by end of next week. >> >> ISSUE-1 >> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/1 >> >> This is about supporting reification. We had a proposal at some point >> [1], but at this point there seems to be a consensus to stay away from >> reification support, given that some don't even consider it part of the >> RDF specification. >> >> The current proposal on the table, then, is to not support reification. >> Please send +1 or disagreements ASAP! >> >> -Ben >> >> >> [1] >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2006Apr/0007 >> >> >> > > -- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead URL: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ PGP Key: http://www.cwi.nl/%7Eivan/AboutMe/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Thursday, 28 June 2007 08:10:36 UTC