W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > June 2007

Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-1: reification

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 10:10:32 +0200
Message-ID: <46836CF8.2030705@w3.org>
To: mark.birbeck@x-port.net
CC: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>, RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, SWD WG <public-swd-wg@w3.org>
+1 with both statements

Ivan

Mark Birbeck wrote:
> 
> Hi Ben,
> 
> No problem with this, but might need to pin down the detail of how we
> do this. For example, by removing the ability to put <link> and <meta>
> anywhere in the document (which we've discussed because many browsers
> move those elements out of context and into <head>) we lose the
> current technique for supporting reification anyway.
> 
> So I guess what I'm saying is "+1 for removing 'link and meta
> anywhere', and then "+1 for *not* reinstating reification with some
> other syntax".
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Mark
> 
> On 27/06/07, Ben Adida <ben@adida.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>> In our continuing effort to close issues, I want to bring up a few more
>> for discussion. We will attempt to close these by end of next week.
>>
>> ISSUE-1
>> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/1
>>
>> This is about supporting reification. We had a proposal at some point
>> [1], but at this point there seems to be a consensus to stay away from
>> reification support, given that some don't even consider it part of the
>> RDF specification.
>>
>> The current proposal on the table, then, is to not support reification.
>> Please send +1 or disagreements ASAP!
>>
>> -Ben
>>
>>
>> [1]
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2006Apr/0007
>>
>>
>>
> 
> 

-- 

Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
URL: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
PGP Key: http://www.cwi.nl/%7Eivan/AboutMe/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf

Received on Thursday, 28 June 2007 08:10:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:50:23 UTC