W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > June 2007

RE: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type

From: Hausenblas, Michael <michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 08:57:53 +0200
Message-ID: <768DACDC356ED04EA1F1130F97D29852011C57BA@RZJC2EX.jr1.local>
To: "Ben Adida" <ben@adida.net>
Cc: "RDFa" <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, "SWD WG" <public-swd-wg@w3.org>


+1

Cheers,
	Michael

----------------------------------------------------------
 Michael Hausenblas, MSc.
 Institute of Information Systems & Information Management
 JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH
  
 http://www.joanneum.at/iis/
----------------------------------------------------------
 

>-----Original Message-----
>From: public-swd-wg-request@w3.org 
>[mailto:public-swd-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Ben Adida
>Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 4:45 AM
>To: RDFa; SWD WG
>Subject: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type
>
>
>
>Another issue up for discussion.
>
>ISSUE-3
>http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/3
>
>The question is what @class and @role should yield in XHTML1.1+RDFa. We
>don't have complete consensus on this (we specifically note Steven
>Pemberton's worries about the reuse of the @class attribute), but the
>current solution, as accepted in the Primer and in many use 
>cases, is as
>follows:
>
>@class yields rdf:type only if the value is namespace-qualified. @class
>contains a space-separated list of values. Only those values which are
>namespace-qualified yield rdf:type triples.
>
>@role does not exist in XHTML1.1, so it is not used here. In XHTML2, it
>is expected to yield a triple with predicate xhtml2:role.
>
>+1 if you agree, otherwise email your disagreements and explanation.
>
>-Ben
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 27 June 2007 06:55:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:50:23 UTC