W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > June 2007

Re: Validation Update: success!

From: CÚdric Mesnage <cedric.mesnage@lu.unisi.ch>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 12:58:08 +0200
Message-Id: <9A9FC218-C715-4C3A-8D22-965D950FE377@lu.unisi.ch>
Cc: RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
To: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>
This is great, I programmed against it yesterday and now RDFa On  
Rails generates RDFa which validates.

My homepage is valid XHTML+RDFa, generated with RDFa On Rails! Go  
check it:

http://validator-test.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fcedricmesnage.org% 
2Findex.xhtml

Cheers!

---
CÚdric Mesnage
PhD Student
cedric.mesnage@lu.unisi.ch
http://www.cedricmesnage.org
http://blog.cedricmesnage.org/


On Jun 13, 2007, at 7:09 PM, Ben Adida wrote:

>
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I just noticed that the W3C validator team has added XHTML+RDFa  
> support
> and no longer throws errors on xmlns:* attributes in its beta-version
> validator [1]. I'm guessing both of these things are due in large part
> to Shane, though he may be too humble and busy to admit it :)
>
> The validator is at:
> http://validator-test.w3.org
>
> and you can specifically check my FOAF card:
> http://validator-test.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fben.adida.net% 
> 2Fcard.xhtml&charset=%28detect+automatically%29&doctype=Inline&group=0
>
> That's right, it validates, nothing weird, just XHTML+RDFa and the  
> right
> DTD declaration.
>
> Though I take no credit for this, I note that my action to check on
> XML-DTD validation is likely DONE, or at least WITHDRAWN!
>
> -Ben
>
> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-validator/2007Jun/ 
> 0002.html
>
Received on Friday, 22 June 2007 10:56:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:50:23 UTC