W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > June 2007

Re: Dumb Question

From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 10:47:28 +0900
Message-Id: <291E8E80-8921-4B2F-9F2D-AA1E5D93463F@w3.org>
To: RDFa force <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>


Le 31 mai 2007 à 22:11, Shane McCarron a écrit :
> I personally still think that using @class at all is a huge  
> mistake.  The (new) HTML Working Group appears to be making that  
> mistake too; adding semantics to class values where none previously  
> existed.

It has been removed from the [HTML 5 Editors draft][1], because many  
people were complaining about it.


[1]: http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/html5/spec/

-- 
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
   QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/
      *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Friday, 1 June 2007 01:47:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:50:23 UTC