W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > June 2007

Re: [RDFa TC] Review and Approval of XHTML Test Case partition

From: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 18:08:41 -0700
Message-ID: <46830A19.4000003@adida.net>
To: "Hausenblas, Michael" <michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at>
CC: RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, public-swd-wg@w3.org


Michael,

A few points on the test cases: I think they need some reviewing before
they're approved. I know you've been swamped, so please call out if you
need help, because I fear we're putting too much work on your shoulders!

OVERALL

- about CC: can you change the namespace in all examples to
http://creativecommons.org/ns#? We made the change a while ago, and the
tests should reflect them ASAP. Thanks!

- a number of bad subjects throughout: it looks like you're using the
old URIs of the test cases as subject, e.g. testcases/000106.html
instead of xhtml1-testcases/0023. There are a number of these, and a few
.ttl also instead of .html.

- a number of examples use XMLLiteral instead of plain literal when the
content has no markup in it. As per our agreement on the resolution, we
should change these. It's mostly when you have "Mark Birbeck", but it
happens a dozen times.


SPECIFICALLY:

0002: We'll need to discuss whether we keep META in the body.

0003: same comment as 0002.

0005: CURIE in the @href in XHTML 1.1... I'm very worried about this, I
guess we should bring this up for discussion.

0015: a LINK or META on the HEAD of a document resolves to the current
URL as subject, not a bnode.

0019: is a mailto: URI really a good foaf person?

0028: datatype should be "" instead of "plainliteral"

0029: should the xsd:string really trigger the stripping of markup? I
guess so, just wanted to make sure that's what we want.

-Ben

Hausenblas, Michael wrote:
> 
> All,
> 
> As the responsible for the RDFa Test Cases, I'd like to invite you
> to have a look at the current state of the RDFa Test Suite [1].
> 
> Ben pointed out earlier today [2] that we plan to review and approve
> the XHTML Test Case partition at our tomorrow's RDFa telecon. 
> Though the remaining time is very limited, I'd very much appreciate
> it if you spent some minutes testing your RDFa extractor with the
> currently proposed XHTML TC partition, available at [3], along with
> the test manifest document [4].
> 
> Any feedback is welcome!
> 
> Cheers,
> 	Michael
>  
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/testsuite/
> [2]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2007Jun/0144.
> html
> [3] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/testsuite/xhtml1-testcases/
> [4]
> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/testsuite/xhtml1-testcases/rdfa-xhtml
> 1-test-manifest.rdf
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>  Michael Hausenblas, MSc.
>  Institute of Information Systems & Information Management
>  JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH
>  Steyrergasse 17, A-8010 Graz, AUSTRIA
> 
>  <office>
>     phone: +43-316-876-1193 (fax:-1191)   
>    e-mail: michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at
>       web: http://www.joanneum.at/iis/ 
> 
>  <private>
>    mobile: +43-660-7621761
>       web: http://www.sw-app.org/
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> 
Received on Thursday, 28 June 2007 01:09:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:50:23 UTC