Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-5

+1. Curies only.  Remember however that the curie spec is NOT done, so 
you are making your research dependent on someone elses research. Rarely 
a good idea.

Ben Adida wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> ISSUE-5 is on our list:
> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/5
>
> This is about whether @REL/@REV/@PROPERTY should be CURIE only (QNames,
> most of the time), or CURIE/URI, like about. In other words, should we
> write:
>
> <span property="dc:title">RDFa Specification</span>
>
> or
>
> <span property="[dc:title]">RDFa Specification</span>
>
>
> Given that we have been writing all specs and implementations using the
> assumption that these are *only* CURIEs (no square brackets), I propose
> that we make these attributes CURIE only.
>
> Remember, I'm counting on your prompt response on all of these issues!
>
> -Ben
>   

-- 
Shane P. McCarron                          Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120
Managing Director                            Fax: +1 763 786-8180
ApTest Minnesota                            Inet: shane@aptest.com