> Ben Adida wrote: > > > > Issue #28: > > http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/28 > > > > DanC asked us: "how does one follow one's nose to the RDFa specification > > from an HTML+RDFa document?" > > > > I propose that we respond to this question by pointing to the DTD > > declaration we now recommend for XHTML1.1+RDFa documents. > > > > I also propose that we specify an official W3C profile for XHTML1.1+RDFa > > which would include a GRDDL transformation for XHTML1.1+RDFa. Ivan: > I have been advocating an official profile for a while. Ie, I agree. Simone: Also for me, I agree.Received on Tuesday, 19 June 2007 09:58:54 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:15:05 GMT