W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > June 2007

Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-5

From: Niklas Lindström <lindstream@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 02:30:53 +0200
Message-ID: <cf8107640706181730q39b07575ld557eb7620d10926@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Ben Adida" <ben@adida.net>
Cc: RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, "SWD WG" <public-swd-wg@w3.org>

+1 for CURIE only. (They represent predicates, which I feel are better
represented in qname form.)

Best regards,
Niklas


On 6/19/07, Ben Adida <ben@adida.net> wrote:
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> ISSUE-5 is on our list:
> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/5
>
> This is about whether @REL/@REV/@PROPERTY should be CURIE only (QNames,
> most of the time), or CURIE/URI, like about. In other words, should we
> write:
>
> <span property="dc:title">RDFa Specification</span>
>
> or
>
> <span property="[dc:title]">RDFa Specification</span>
>
>
> Given that we have been writing all specs and implementations using the
> assumption that these are *only* CURIEs (no square brackets), I propose
> that we make these attributes CURIE only.
>
> Remember, I'm counting on your prompt response on all of these issues!
>
> -Ben
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 19 June 2007 00:30:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:50:23 UTC