- From: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 08:12:37 -0700
- To: mark.birbeck@x-port.net
- CC: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, SWD WG <public-swd-wg@w3.org>
Mark Birbeck wrote: > Hi Ben, > > I'm not sure I agree. Sure we've done talks, but the main source of > information for people, going forward, will be the primer and our > various specs. Mark, I need to be a bit of a stickler here, because we all talked about this in our May 31st conference call after all the May talks, and we agreed that we couldn't make RDFa a moving target: http://www.w3.org/2007/05/31-rdfa-minutes.html Removing the meaning of @class would make RDFa very much a moving target, and, no matter how technically beautiful an alternate solution is, we would lose a significant chunk of folks who are beginning to depend on the syntax. In other words, I think our "last chance" to change this particular, central RDFa issue has passed. -Ben
Received on Thursday, 28 June 2007 15:12:54 UTC