public-html@w3.org from December 2009 by author

Anne van Kesteren

• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Thursday, 31 December)
• Re: WebGL | The 3D Canvas Context for HTML (Wednesday, 16 December)
• Re: WebGL | The 3D Canvas Context for HTML (Friday, 11 December)
• Re: Inconsistent |typeof HTMLCanvasElement| (Tuesday, 8 December)

Arun Ranganathan

• Re: WebGL | The 3D Canvas Context for HTML (Friday, 11 December)
• WebGL | The 3D Canvas Context for HTML (Thursday, 10 December)

Aryeh Gregor

• Re: AW: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Wednesday, 30 December)
• Re: AW: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Tuesday, 29 December)
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Tuesday, 29 December)
• Re: AW: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Monday, 28 December)
• Re: AW: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Monday, 28 December)
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Monday, 28 December)
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Monday, 28 December)
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Monday, 28 December)
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Thursday, 24 December)
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Thursday, 24 December)
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Tuesday, 22 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: If we fixed namespaces, does RDFa still have problems? (Monday, 14 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: If we fixed namespaces, does RDFa still have problems? (Monday, 14 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: If we fixed namespaces, does RDFa still have problems? (Friday, 11 December)
• Re: Change Proposals and FPWD Resolutions (Wednesday, 9 December)
• Re: Change Proposals and FPWD Resolutions (Wednesday, 9 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (Monday, 7 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (Sunday, 6 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (Friday, 4 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (Friday, 4 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (Thursday, 3 December)

Ben Millard

• New UI for HTML5 Table Inspector (Saturday, 12 December)

Benjamin Nowack

• Re: ISSUE-76: If we fixed namespaces, does RDFa still have problems? (Monday, 14 December)

Boris Zbarsky

• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Tuesday, 29 December)
• Re: http content type authoritative for object data? (Thursday, 10 December)
• Re: http content type authoritative for object data? (Tuesday, 8 December)

bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

• [Bug 8554] <progress> element should be labelable with a label (Sunday, 27 December)
• [Bug 8555] Remove the Meter Element (Sunday, 27 December)
• [Bug 8552] Remove the Progress Element (Saturday, 26 December)
• [Bug 8450] Case insensitivity of @rel vs case sensitivity of URIs (Friday, 11 December)
• [Bug 8476] <canvas> contexts (Friday, 11 December)
• [Bug 8449] Remove extraneous material from Table section (Monday, 7 December)
• [Bug 8447] Tighter definition on the aside element (Monday, 7 December)
• [Bug 5821] meta/@scheme missing (Tuesday, 1 December)

Charles McCathieNevile

• Re: ISSUE-30 (Longdesc) Change Proposal (Thursday, 17 December)
• Re: ISSUE-30 (Longdesc) Change Proposal (Thursday, 17 December)
• Re: ISSUE-74: canvas-accessibility - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Thursday, 10 December)
• Re: ISSUE-74: canvas-accessibility - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Wednesday, 9 December)

Chris Double

• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Wednesday, 30 December)

Cynthia Shelly

• RE: CHANGE PROPOSAL: Table Summary (Tuesday, 1 December)

Dailey, David P.

• RE: discussions of HTML6 (Friday, 4 December)

David Calhoun

• Change proposal: Adding a sprite attribute to img tags (Friday, 4 December)

David Carlisle

• [Entities-last-call] - htmlmath entities collection (Thursday, 3 December)
• Re: DOCTYPE versioning change proposal (ISSUE-4) (Tuesday, 1 December)

David Singer

• Re: discussions of HTML6 (Friday, 4 December)

Don Brutzman

• Re: X3D comments in Bug 8238. (Wednesday, 16 December)

Edward O'Connor

• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Tuesday, 29 December)
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Monday, 28 December)

Ennals, Robert

• RE: ISSUE-76: If we fixed namespaces, does RDFa still have problems? (Monday, 14 December)
• RE: ISSUE-76: If we fixed namespaces, does RDFa still have problems? (Monday, 14 December)
• RE: ISSUE-76: If we fixed namespaces, does RDFa still have problems? (Monday, 14 December)
• RE: ISSUE-76: If we fixed namespaces, does RDFa still have problems? (Monday, 14 December)
• RE: ISSUE-76: If we fixed namespaces, does RDFa still have problems? (Saturday, 12 December)
• RE: ISSUE-76: If we fixed namespaces, does RDFa still have problems? (Friday, 11 December)
• ISSUE-76: If we fixed namespaces, does RDFa still have problems? (Friday, 11 December)

Gavin Carothers

• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Thursday, 24 December)
• Public feedback on HTML5 video (Tuesday, 22 December)

Geoffrey Sneddon

• Selectedness when adding options (was: Re: Setting selectedIndex before adding option with that index) (Tuesday, 15 December)
• Re: Setting selectedIndex before adding option with that index (Tuesday, 15 December)
• Re: Renamed topic: focus and length of HTML5 (Monday, 7 December)

Gregory J. Rosmaita

• minutes: html5 a11y task force canvas sub group telecon minutes 2009-12-17 [draft] (Friday, 18 December)

Henri Sivonen

• Comments about the ACTION-165 draft (Friday, 18 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: If we fixed namespaces, does RDFa still have problems? (Wednesday, 16 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: If we fixed namespaces, does RDFa still have problems? (Tuesday, 15 December)
• Re: DOCTYPE versioning change proposal (ISSUE-4) (Friday, 4 December)

Ian Hickson

• Re: FW: ACTION-133: Develop an accessibility API and model for canvas as well as attributes to specify alternative content (Thursday, 17 December)
• Re: FW: ACTION-133: Develop an accessibility API and model for canvas as well as attributes to specify alternative content (Thursday, 17 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: If we fixed namespaces, does RDFa still have problems? (Tuesday, 15 December)
• Features beyond HTML5 (Friday, 11 December)
• Re: reasonable length of time before bugs in bugzilla database are addressed (Thursday, 10 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate (Thursday, 10 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (Thursday, 10 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (Thursday, 10 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (Thursday, 10 December)
• Re: Ability to submit invalid forms (Wednesday, 9 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (Tuesday, 8 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (Tuesday, 8 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (Monday, 7 December)
• Re: Renamed topic: focus and length of HTML5 (Monday, 7 December)
• Re: Renamed topic: focus and length of HTML5 (Sunday, 6 December)
• Re: Renamed topic: focus and length of HTML5 (Saturday, 5 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (Friday, 4 December)
• Re: DOCTYPE versioning change proposal (ISSUE-4) (Friday, 4 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (Thursday, 3 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (Thursday, 3 December)
• RE: DOCTYPE versioning change proposal (ISSUE-4) (Wednesday, 2 December)
• Re: DOCTYPE versioning change proposal (ISSUE-4) (Tuesday, 1 December)

James Graham

• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (Friday, 4 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (Thursday, 3 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (Thursday, 3 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (Thursday, 3 December)

Jens Meiert

• Re: Dropping Microdata entirely (Saturday, 5 December)

Jeremy Keith

• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Monday, 28 December)

Jeroen van der Gun

• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists (Wednesday, 2 December)
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists (Wednesday, 2 December)
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists (Wednesday, 2 December)
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists (Wednesday, 2 December)
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists (Wednesday, 2 December)
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists (Wednesday, 2 December)
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists (Tuesday, 1 December)
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists (Tuesday, 1 December)

Jirka Kosek

• Re: DOCTYPE versioning change proposal (ISSUE-4) (Friday, 4 December)
• Re: DOCTYPE versioning change proposal (ISSUE-4) (Friday, 4 December)
• Re: DOCTYPE versioning change proposal (ISSUE-4) (Tuesday, 1 December)

Joe D Williams

• Re: http content type authoritative for object data? (Tuesday, 15 December)
• Re: http content type authoritative for object data? (Tuesday, 15 December)
• Re: http content type authoritative for object data? (Sunday, 13 December)
• Re: http content type authoritative for object data? (Saturday, 12 December)
• Re: http content type authoritative for object data? (Friday, 11 December)
• Re: Param (Tuesday, 1 December)

John Foliot

• RE: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Tuesday, 29 December)
• RE: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (Tuesday, 8 December)

Jonas Sicking

• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Monday, 28 December)
• Re: http content type authoritative for object data? (Thursday, 10 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (Thursday, 10 December)
• Re: http content type authoritative for object data? (Thursday, 10 December)
• Re: http content type authoritative for object data? (Thursday, 10 December)
• Re: http content type authoritative for object data? (Wednesday, 9 December)

Julian Reschke

• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Thursday, 31 December)
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Thursday, 31 December)
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Tuesday, 29 December)
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Monday, 28 December)
• Re: CHANGE PROPOSAL: Remove ping and hyperlink auditing (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2) (Thursday, 17 December)
• Re: http content type authoritative for object data? (Sunday, 13 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (Friday, 11 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76 - Microdata - Straw Poll for Objections (Friday, 11 December)
• Re: http content type authoritative for object data? (Friday, 11 December)
• Re: http content type authoritative for object data? (Thursday, 10 December)
• Re: http content type authoritative for object data? (Thursday, 10 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (Thursday, 10 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (Thursday, 10 December)
• Re: http content type authoritative for object data? (Thursday, 10 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (Thursday, 10 December)
• Re: http content type authoritative for object data? (Thursday, 10 December)
• Re: http content type authoritative for object data? (Wednesday, 9 December)
• Re: http content type authoritative for object data? (Tuesday, 8 December)
• http content type authoritative for object data? (Tuesday, 8 December)
• Re: CHANGE PROPOSAL: Remove ping and hyperlink auditing (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2) (Tuesday, 8 December)
• Re: Renamed topic: focus and length of HTML5 (Monday, 7 December)
• Re: Renamed topic: focus and length of HTML5 (Sunday, 6 December)
• Re: Renamed topic: focus and length of HTML5 (Saturday, 5 December)
• Renamed topic: focus and length of HTML5, was: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (Friday, 4 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (Friday, 4 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (Friday, 4 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (Friday, 4 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (Thursday, 3 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (Thursday, 3 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (Thursday, 3 December)
• Re: DOCTYPE versioning change proposal (ISSUE-4) (Tuesday, 1 December)

Karl Dubost

• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Thursday, 24 December)
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Thursday, 24 December)
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Thursday, 24 December)

Kornel

• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Tuesday, 22 December)

Kornel Lesinski

• Re: CHANGE PROPOSAL: Remove ping and hyperlink auditing (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2) (Monday, 7 December)

Krzysztof Maczyński

• Re: Change Proposals and FPWD Resolutions (Wednesday, 9 December)
• Re: Change Proposals and FPWD Resolutions (Wednesday, 9 December)
• Re: Change Proposals and FPWD Resolutions (Wednesday, 9 December)

L. David Baron

• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Tuesday, 22 December)
• Re: DOCTYPE versioning change proposal (ISSUE-4) (Friday, 4 December)

Lachlan Hunt

• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Thursday, 24 December)
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Thursday, 24 December)
• Re: DOCTYPE versioning change proposal (ISSUE-4) (Friday, 4 December)
• Re: ACTION-103 Follow up on the about: scheme Registration (Thursday, 3 December)
• Re: DOCTYPE versioning change proposal (ISSUE-4) (Tuesday, 1 December)

Larry Masinter

• HTML WG issues scheduled to close Dec 17 comments (Sunday, 13 December)
• RE: DOCTYPE versioning change proposal (ISSUE-4) (Saturday, 12 December)
• RE: HTML CHANGE PROPOSAL; change definition of URL to normative reference to IRIBIS (Saturday, 12 December)
• RE: DOCTYPE versioning change proposal (ISSUE-4) (Wednesday, 2 December)
• RE: DOCTYPE versioning change proposal (ISSUE-4) (Wednesday, 2 December)
• RE: HTML CHANGE PROPOSAL; change definition of URL to normative reference to IRIBIS (Tuesday, 1 December)
• DOCTYPE versioning change proposal (ISSUE-4) (Tuesday, 1 December)

Laura Carlson

• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Tuesday, 29 December)
• Re: Comments about the ACTION-165 draft (Friday, 18 December)
• Re: ISSUE-30 (Longdesc) Change Proposal (Friday, 18 December)
• Re: ISSUE-30 (Longdesc) Change Proposal (Thursday, 17 December)
• Re: ISSUE-30 (Longdesc) Change Proposal (Thursday, 17 December)
• Re: ESW Wiki (was Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification) (Thursday, 3 December)
• Re: change proposal:modification to section 4.8.2.1 the img element (Thursday, 3 December)
• ESW Wiki (was Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification) (Wednesday, 2 December)
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists (Tuesday, 1 December)
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists (Tuesday, 1 December)

Leif Halvard Silli

• Re: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Wednesday, 30 December)
• Re: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Tuesday, 29 December)
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Tuesday, 29 December)
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Tuesday, 29 December)
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Tuesday, 29 December)
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Monday, 28 December)
• Re: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Thursday, 17 December)
• Re: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Wednesday, 16 December)
• RE: ISSUE-76: If we fixed namespaces, does RDFa still have problems? (Wednesday, 16 December)
• RE: ISSUE-76: If we fixed namespaces, does RDFa still have problems? (Tuesday, 15 December)
• Re: http content type authoritative for object data? (Tuesday, 15 December)
• Re: http content type authoritative for object data? (Sunday, 13 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate (Friday, 11 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate (Thursday, 10 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate (Thursday, 10 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (Thursday, 10 December)
• Re: http content type authoritative for object data? (Thursday, 10 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (Thursday, 10 December)
• Re: Change Proposals and FPWD Resolutions (Thursday, 10 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (Friday, 4 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (Friday, 4 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (Friday, 4 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (Friday, 4 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (Thursday, 3 December)
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists (Thursday, 3 December)
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists (Wednesday, 2 December)
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists (Wednesday, 2 December)
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists (Wednesday, 2 December)
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists (Wednesday, 2 December)
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists (Wednesday, 2 December)
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists (Wednesday, 2 December)
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists (Wednesday, 2 December)
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists (Wednesday, 2 December)
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists (Tuesday, 1 December)
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists (Tuesday, 1 December)
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists (Tuesday, 1 December)
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists (Tuesday, 1 December)
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists (Tuesday, 1 December)
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists (Tuesday, 1 December)

Maciej Stachowiak

• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Thursday, 24 December)
• Re: ACTION-133: Develop an accessibility API and model for canvas as well as attributes to specify alternative content (Thursday, 17 December)
• Re: ISSUE-30 (Longdesc) Change Proposal (Thursday, 17 December)
• Re: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Tuesday, 15 December)
• Re: CfC: Close ISSUE-67 h:tml-parsing-dom - extended to 2010-01-07 (Tuesday, 15 December)
• Re: CfC: Close ISSUE-59 normative-language-reference extended to 2010-01-07 (Tuesday, 15 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: If we fixed namespaces, does RDFa still have problems? (Monday, 14 December)
• Re: HTML WG issues scheduled to close Dec 17 comments (Sunday, 13 December)
• Re: DOCTYPE versioning change proposal (ISSUE-4) (Saturday, 12 December)
• Re: HTML CHANGE PROPOSAL; change definition of URL to normative reference to IRIBIS (Saturday, 12 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76 - Microdata - Straw Poll for Objections (Friday, 11 December)
• Re: reasonable length of time before bugs in bugzilla database are addressed (Thursday, 10 December)
• Re: reasonable length of time before bugs in bugzilla database are addressed (Thursday, 10 December)
• ISSUE-76 - Microdata - Straw Poll for Objections (Thursday, 10 December)
• Re: ISSUE-66: image-analysis - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Thursday, 10 December)
• Re: ISSUE-83: dt-dd-semantics - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Wednesday, 9 December)
• Issues and Change Proposals Status list updated (Wednesday, 9 December)
• Re: ISSUE-74: canvas-accessibility - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Wednesday, 9 December)
• Re: ISSUE-83: dt-dd-semantics - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Wednesday, 9 December)
• Re: Change Proposals and FPWD Resolutions (Wednesday, 9 December)
• Re: Change Proposals and FPWD Resolutions (Wednesday, 9 December)
• ISSUE-74: canvas-accessibility - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Wednesday, 9 December)
• ISSUE-84: legacy-doctypes - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Wednesday, 9 December)
• ISSUE-83: dt-dd-semantics - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Wednesday, 9 December)
• ISSUE-81: representation-vs-resource - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Wednesday, 9 December)
• ISSUE-66: image-analysis - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Wednesday, 9 December)
• ISSUE-79: meta-keywords - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Wednesday, 9 December)
• CfC: Close ISSUE-73 predefined-voc (ends 2009-12-17) (Tuesday, 8 December)
• CfC: Close ISSUE-59 normative-language-reference (ends 2009-12-17) (Tuesday, 8 December)
• CfC: Close ISSUE-67 h:tml-parsing-dom (ends 2009-12-17) (Tuesday, 8 December)
• CfC: Close ISSUE-35 aria-processing (ends 2009-12-17) (Tuesday, 8 December)
• Plan to resolve ISSUE-76 RDFa / Microdata (Tuesday, 8 December)
• Change Proposals and FPWD Resolutions (Tuesday, 8 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (Tuesday, 8 December)
• Re: Path forward on Microdata (Tuesday, 8 December)
• Re: HTML CHANGE PROPOSAL; change definition of URL to normative reference to IRIBIS (Tuesday, 8 December)
• Re: change proposal:modification to section 4.8.2.1 the img element (Tuesday, 8 December)
• Re: ISSUE-30 (Longdesc) Change Proposal (Tuesday, 8 December)
• Re: DOCTYPE versioning change proposal (ISSUE-4) (Tuesday, 8 December)
• Re: CHANGE PROPOSAL: Remove ping and hyperlink auditing (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2) (Tuesday, 8 December)
• Re: Path forward on Microdata (Tuesday, 8 December)
• Decision Process (Re: Splitting HTML from the HTML DOM (was Re: Renamed topic: focus and length of HTML5)) (Monday, 7 December)
• Re: Splitting HTML from the HTML DOM (was Re: Renamed topic: focus and length of HTML5) (Monday, 7 December)
• Re: Splitting HTML from the HTML DOM (was Re: Renamed topic: focus and length of HTML5) (Monday, 7 December)
• Path forward on Microdata (Monday, 7 December)
• Splitting HTML from the HTML DOM (was Re: Renamed topic: focus and length of HTML5) (Monday, 7 December)
• Re: Dropping Microdata entirely (Monday, 7 December)
• Re: Dropping Microdata entirely (Monday, 7 December)
• Re: CHANGE PROPOSAL: Remove ping and hyperlink auditing (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2) (Sunday, 6 December)
• Re: Dropping Microdata entirely (Saturday, 5 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (Friday, 4 December)
• Re: change proposal:modification to section 4.8.2.1 the img element (Friday, 4 December)
• Re: change proposal:modification to section 4.8.2.1 the img element (Friday, 4 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (Friday, 4 December)
• Re: discussions of HTML6 (Friday, 4 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (Friday, 4 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (Friday, 4 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (Thursday, 3 December)
• Re: ESW Wiki (was Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification) (Wednesday, 2 December)
• Re: ESW Wiki (was Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification) (Wednesday, 2 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (Wednesday, 2 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (Wednesday, 2 December)
• Re: ISSUE-83 ACTION-152 Change Proposal for the use of dt/dd in figure and details (Wednesday, 2 December)
• Re: ISSUE-83 ACTION-152 Change Proposal for the use of dt/dd in figure and details (Tuesday, 1 December)
• Re: HTML CHANGE PROPOSAL; change definition of URL to normative reference to IRIBIS (Tuesday, 1 December)
• Re: ISSUE-83 ACTION-152 Change Proposal for the use of dt/dd in figure and details (Tuesday, 1 December)
• Re: CHANGE PROPOSAL: Table Summary (Tuesday, 1 December)
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists (Tuesday, 1 December)
• Re: DOCTYPE versioning change proposal (ISSUE-4) (Tuesday, 1 December)

Manu Sporny

• Re: ISSUE-76: If we fixed namespaces, does RDFa still have problems? (Monday, 14 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: If we fixed namespaces, does RDFa still have problems? (Monday, 14 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: If we fixed namespaces, does RDFa still have problems? (Monday, 14 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: If we fixed namespaces, does RDFa still have problems? (Monday, 14 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: If we fixed namespaces, does RDFa still have problems? (Friday, 11 December)
• ISSUE-76: CHANGE PROPOSAL (Draft 4): Separate Microdata from HTML5 Specification (Wednesday, 9 December)
• ISSUE-76: CHANGE PROPOSAL (Draft 3): Separate Microdata from HTML5 Specification (Wednesday, 9 December)
• Re: Change Proposals and FPWD Resolutions (Wednesday, 9 December)
• Re: Change Proposals and FPWD Resolutions (Wednesday, 9 December)
• Re: Change Proposals and FPWD Resolutions (Wednesday, 9 December)
• Re: Change Proposals and FPWD Resolutions (Wednesday, 9 December)
• ISSUE-76: CHANGE PROPOSAL (Draft 3): Separate Microdata from HTML5 Specification (Wednesday, 9 December)
• Re: Path forward on Microdata (Tuesday, 8 December)
• ISSUE-76: CHANGE PROPOSAL (Draft 2): Separate Microdata from HTML5 Specification (Tuesday, 8 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (Friday, 4 December)

Mark Baker

• Re: ESW Wiki (was Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification) (Thursday, 3 December)

Mark Nottingham

• Re: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Tuesday, 29 December)
• Re: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Tuesday, 29 December)

Martin McEvoy

• Re: ISSUE-76: If we fixed namespaces, does RDFa still have problems? (Friday, 11 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (Tuesday, 8 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (Monday, 7 December)

Matt May

• Re: ISSUE-66: image-analysis - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Thursday, 10 December)
• Re: ISSUE-66: image-analysis - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Thursday, 10 December)

Michael Cooper

• Minutes HTML WG 3 December 2009 (Friday, 4 December)

Michael(tm) Smith

• Re: ESW Wiki (was Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification) (Thursday, 3 December)
• Re: ESW Wiki (was Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification) (Thursday, 3 December)

Mike Taylor

• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Tuesday, 22 December)

Nick Fitzsimons

• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists (Tuesday, 1 December)
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists (Tuesday, 1 December)

Patrick Garies

• Re: Inconsistent |typeof HTMLCanvasElement| (Wednesday, 9 December)
• Inconsistent |typeof HTMLCanvasElement| (Sunday, 6 December)
• Re: Change proposal: Adding a sprite attribute to img tags (Friday, 4 December)

Paul Cotton

• FW: ACTION-133: Develop an accessibility API and model for canvas as well as attributes to specify alternative content (Thursday, 17 December)
• Re: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Wednesday, 16 December)
• {agenda} HTML WG telcon 2009-12-17: action items, calls for consensus/proposals, task forces (Tuesday, 15 December)
• RE: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Tuesday, 15 December)

Philip Jägenstedt

• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Thursday, 31 December)
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Thursday, 31 December)
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Wednesday, 30 December)
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Tuesday, 29 December)
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Tuesday, 29 December)
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Tuesday, 29 December)
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Tuesday, 29 December)
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Tuesday, 29 December)
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Tuesday, 29 December)
• Re: AW: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Tuesday, 29 December)
• Re: AW: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Monday, 28 December)
• Re: AW: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Monday, 28 December)
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Monday, 28 December)
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Monday, 28 December)
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Thursday, 24 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (Friday, 4 December)

Philip Taylor

• Re: Ability to submit invalid forms (Tuesday, 8 December)

Ric Hardacre

• Re: Ability to submit invalid forms (Wednesday, 9 December)
• Ability to submit invalid forms (Tuesday, 8 December)

Richard Schwerdtfeger

• Re: ARIA roles added to the a element should be conforming in HTML5. (Tuesday, 1 December)

rita Turkowski

• Re: X3D comments in Bug 8238. (Thursday, 10 December)

Robert O'Callahan

• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Thursday, 31 December)
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Thursday, 31 December)
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Friday, 25 December)

Roy T. Fielding

• Re: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Wednesday, 30 December)
• Re: http content type authoritative for object data? (Friday, 11 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate (Friday, 11 December)
• Re: CHANGE PROPOSAL: Remove ping and hyperlink auditing (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2) (Tuesday, 8 December)
• CHANGE PROPOSAL: Remove ping and hyperlink auditing (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2) (Sunday, 6 December)
• Re: Change proposal: Adding a sprite attribute to img tags (Friday, 4 December)

Sam Ruby

• Re: CHANGE PROPOSAL: Remove ping and hyperlink auditing (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2) (Thursday, 17 December)
• Minutes HTML WG 10 December 2009 (Tuesday, 15 December)
• Re: Change Proposals and FPWD Resolutions (Wednesday, 9 December)
• Re: ISSUE-63: origin-req-scope - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Wednesday, 9 December)
• Re: ISSUE-7: video-codecs - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Wednesday, 9 December)
• Re: Change Proposals and FPWD Resolutions (Wednesday, 9 December)
• Re: Change Proposals and FPWD Resolutions (Wednesday, 9 December)
• Re: Change Proposals and FPWD Resolutions (Wednesday, 9 December)
• Re: Change Proposals and FPWD Resolutions (Wednesday, 9 December)
• Re: Splitting HTML from the HTML DOM (was Re: Renamed topic: focus and length of HTML5) (Monday, 7 December)
• Re: Splitting HTML from the HTML DOM (was Re: Renamed topic: focus and length of HTML5) (Monday, 7 December)
• Re: Splitting HTML from the HTML DOM (was Re: Renamed topic: focus and length of HTML5) (Monday, 7 December)
• Re: Splitting HTML from the HTML DOM (was Re: Renamed topic: focus and length of HTML5) (Monday, 7 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (Friday, 4 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (Thursday, 3 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (Thursday, 3 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (Wednesday, 2 December)
• Re: ISSUE-83 ACTION-152 Change Proposal for the use of dt/dd in figure and details (Tuesday, 1 December)

Scheppe, Kai-Dietrich

• RE: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Tuesday, 29 December)
• AW: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Monday, 28 December)
• AW: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Monday, 28 December)
• RE: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Monday, 28 December)
• RE: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Monday, 28 December)
• RE: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Monday, 28 December)

Shelley Powers

• Re: ISSUE-76 - Microdata - Straw Poll for Objections (Friday, 11 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76 - Microdata - Straw Poll for Objections (Friday, 11 December)
• Re: reasonable length of time before bugs in bugzilla database are addressed (Thursday, 10 December)
• Re: reasonable length of time before bugs in bugzilla database are addressed (Thursday, 10 December)
• Re: reasonable length of time before bugs in bugzilla database are addressed (Thursday, 10 December)
• reasonable length of time before bugs in bugzilla database are addressed (Thursday, 10 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (Thursday, 10 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (Thursday, 10 December)
• Re: Change Proposals and FPWD Resolutions (Wednesday, 9 December)
• Re: Change Proposals and FPWD Resolutions (Wednesday, 9 December)
• Re: ISSUE-83: dt-dd-semantics - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Wednesday, 9 December)
• Re: Change Proposals and FPWD Resolutions (Wednesday, 9 December)
• Re: ISSUE-83: dt-dd-semantics - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Wednesday, 9 December)
• Re: Change Proposals and FPWD Resolutions (Wednesday, 9 December)
• Re: Change Proposals and FPWD Resolutions (Wednesday, 9 December)
• Re: Change Proposals and FPWD Resolutions (Wednesday, 9 December)
• Re: Splitting HTML from the HTML DOM (was Re: Renamed topic: focus and length of HTML5) (Monday, 7 December)
• Re: Splitting HTML from the HTML DOM (was Re: Renamed topic: focus and length of HTML5) (Monday, 7 December)
• Re: Splitting HTML from the HTML DOM (was Re: Renamed topic: focus and length of HTML5) (Monday, 7 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (Monday, 7 December)
• Re: Splitting HTML from the HTML DOM (was Re: Renamed topic: focus and length of HTML5) (Monday, 7 December)
• Re: Renamed topic: focus and length of HTML5 (Monday, 7 December)
• Re: Dropping Microdata entirely (Monday, 7 December)
• Re: Dropping Microdata entirely (Monday, 7 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (Sunday, 6 December)
• Re: Renamed topic: focus and length of HTML5 (Sunday, 6 December)
• Re: Dropping Microdata entirely (Saturday, 5 December)
• Re: Dropping Microdata entirely (Saturday, 5 December)
• Dropping Microdata entirely (Saturday, 5 December)
• Re: Renamed topic: focus and length of HTML5 (Saturday, 5 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (Friday, 4 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (Friday, 4 December)
• Re: discussions of HTML6 (Friday, 4 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (Friday, 4 December)
• Re: discussions of HTML6 (Friday, 4 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (Friday, 4 December)
• Re: discussions of HTML6 (Friday, 4 December)
• Re: Renamed topic: focus and length of HTML5 was Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (Friday, 4 December)
• Re: Renamed topic: focus and length of HTML5 was Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (Friday, 4 December)
• Renamed topic: focus and length of HTML5 was Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (Friday, 4 December)
• discussions of HTML6 (Friday, 4 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (Friday, 4 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (Friday, 4 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (Friday, 4 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (Thursday, 3 December)
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists (Wednesday, 2 December)
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists (Wednesday, 2 December)
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists (Wednesday, 2 December)
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists (Wednesday, 2 December)
• Re: ISSUE-83 ACTION-152 Change Proposal for the use of dt/dd in figure and details (Wednesday, 2 December)
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists (Tuesday, 1 December)
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists (Tuesday, 1 December)
• Re: ISSUE-83 ACTION-152 Change Proposal for the use of dt/dd in figure and details (Tuesday, 1 December)
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists (Tuesday, 1 December)
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists (Tuesday, 1 December)
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists (Tuesday, 1 December)
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists (Tuesday, 1 December)
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists (Tuesday, 1 December)
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists (Tuesday, 1 December)
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists (Tuesday, 1 December)
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists (Tuesday, 1 December)
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists (Tuesday, 1 December)
• Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists (Tuesday, 1 December)

Silvia Pfeiffer

• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Thursday, 31 December)
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Thursday, 31 December)
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Wednesday, 30 December)
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Wednesday, 30 December)
• Re: AW: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Wednesday, 30 December)
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Wednesday, 30 December)
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Tuesday, 29 December)
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Tuesday, 29 December)
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Tuesday, 29 December)
• Re: AW: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Tuesday, 29 December)
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Tuesday, 29 December)
• Re: AW: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Tuesday, 29 December)
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Monday, 28 December)

Simon Pieters

• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Tuesday, 22 December)

Steve Axthelm

• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists (Tuesday, 1 December)
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists (Tuesday, 1 December)

Steven Faulkner

• Re: change proposal:modification to section 4.8.2.1 the img element (Wednesday, 9 December)
• Re: change proposal:modification to section 4.8.2.1 the img element (Wednesday, 9 December)
• change proposal:modification to section 4.8.2.1 the img element (Thursday, 3 December)

T.V Raman

• Re: discussions of HTML6 (Friday, 4 December)

Tab Atkins Jr.

• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Thursday, 31 December)
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Thursday, 31 December)
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Wednesday, 30 December)
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Monday, 28 December)
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Monday, 28 December)
• Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video (Thursday, 24 December)
• Re: http content type authoritative for object data? (Thursday, 10 December)
• Re: http content type authoritative for object data? (Thursday, 10 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (Thursday, 10 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (Wednesday, 9 December)
• Re: Splitting HTML from the HTML DOM (was Re: Renamed topic: focus and length of HTML5) (Tuesday, 8 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (Saturday, 5 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (Saturday, 5 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (Saturday, 5 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (Friday, 4 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (Friday, 4 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (Friday, 4 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (Friday, 4 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (Thursday, 3 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (Thursday, 3 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (Wednesday, 2 December)
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists (Wednesday, 2 December)
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists (Wednesday, 2 December)
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists (Wednesday, 2 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (Wednesday, 2 December)
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists (Wednesday, 2 December)
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists (Wednesday, 2 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (Wednesday, 2 December)
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists (Tuesday, 1 December)
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists (Tuesday, 1 December)
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists (Tuesday, 1 December)
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists (Tuesday, 1 December)
• Re: DOCTYPE versioning change proposal (ISSUE-4) (Tuesday, 1 December)
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists (Tuesday, 1 December)
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists (Tuesday, 1 December)
• Re: Bug 8404 -- taking it to the lists (Tuesday, 1 December)

Thomas Broyer

• Re: Ability to submit invalid forms (Wednesday, 9 December)

Tim van Oostrom

• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (Friday, 4 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (Friday, 4 December)

Toby Inkster

• Re: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Wednesday, 30 December)
• Re: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Wednesday, 16 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: If we fixed namespaces, does RDFa still have problems? (Tuesday, 15 December)
• RE: ISSUE-76: If we fixed namespaces, does RDFa still have problems? (Tuesday, 15 December)
• RE: ISSUE-76: If we fixed namespaces, does RDFa still have problems? (Monday, 14 December)
• RE: ISSUE-76: If we fixed namespaces, does RDFa still have problems? (Saturday, 12 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (Monday, 7 December)
• Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (Sunday, 6 December)
• Re: ESW Wiki (was Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification) (Thursday, 3 December)
• Re: DOCTYPE versioning change proposal (ISSUE-4) (Tuesday, 1 December)

Last message date: Thursday, 31 December 2009 21:19:12 UTC