W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > December 2009

Re: Public feedback on HTML5 video

From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 21:38:45 +1100
Message-ID: <2c0e02830912280238w5fbbb4dalf2482a67acabb8b0@mail.gmail.com>
To: robert@ocallahan.org
Cc: Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+w3c@gmail.com>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Gavin Carothers <gavin@carothers.name>, HTMLwg <public-html@w3.org>, comments@daringfireball.net
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 8:14 AM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 25, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+w3c@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> I think it's more useful to load the duration and dimensions.  This is
>> typically going to be only a couple of extra packets loaded
>> asynchronously, right?
> It's worse than that for Ogg, but I agree. Given that there's currently no
> API to say "please load enough to give me the duration and dimensions, but
> no more", that seems like a good default behaviour (and is what Firefox
> does). Well, in fact we also proceed up to loadeddata, even if there is a
> poster frame, but I think that's OK --- it's still a small amount of data
> compared to a full video.
> Rob

In Ogg and Annodex we have used a HTTP parameter called
X-Content-Duration to communicate the duration of a video to a user
agent. It may be an idea to introduce / implement this more widely for
any content type, since typically it is not much of a problem for a
server extension to calculate the duration of a video, but the user
agent has to do all sorts of acrobatics to find out such. There is
just the issue of creating server extensions...

Received on Monday, 28 December 2009 10:39:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:55 UTC