W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > December 2009

Re: Change Proposals and FPWD Resolutions

From: Krzysztof Maczyński <1981km@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 19:09:43 +0100
Message-ID: <901647CDC9814630BACFE111EE9FE356@kmPC>
To: "Maciej Stachowiak" <mjs@apple.com>, "Manu Sporny" <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
Cc: <public-html@w3.org>
> As Sam said, you will be free to state objections to *both* proposals  
> on the table, if you feel you cannot live with either, and feel you  
> can state strong objections to both.
By objecting to Manu's proposal I'd relatively weaken my more important objection to Tab's. Furthermore, I'd be expected to formally object to the result of Manu's proposal if it's chosen. But I'm afraid that the existence of a WD is not a valid target for a Formal Objection. This shows what seems to be wrong with this thinking (or at least much more twisted than a cleaner set of choices).

Manu, given the concerns expressed by Shelley and me about granularity of Change Proposals, would you like now to revert your Change Proposal wrt. this?
If not, would it be OK with you if I created my own Change Proposal almost identical to yours but different in this point? Hence a possible question to the Chairs: by when would such a Change Proposal have to be submitted?

Best regards,

Krzysztof Maczyński
Received on Wednesday, 9 December 2009 18:10:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:54 UTC