xml-dist-app@w3.org from July 2001 by date

Tuesday, 31 July 2001

Re: List of testable assertions in the SOAP Version 1.2 specification Hugo Haas
[TBTF] Binding Context Paul Denning
Re: Proposed resolution: issues 78, 16 Paul Denning
RE: Toss section 5 (create SOAP-lite) Scott Hinkelman
RE: Toss section 5 (create SOAP-lite) Doug Davis
Re: Toss section 5 (create SOAP-lite) christopher ferris
RE: Toss section 5 (create SOAP-lite) Daniela Florescu
Re: Toss section 5 (create SOAP-lite) Roger L. Costello
RE: Toss section 5 (create SOAP-lite) Doug Davis
Re: Toss section 5 (create SOAP-lite) Dan Brickley
FW: Toss section 5 (create SOAP-lite) Daniela Florescu
(Fwd) RE: Toss section 5 (create SOAP-lite) Bob Cunnings
RE: Toss section 5 (create SOAP-lite) Scott Cantor
RE: Toss section 5 (create SOAP-lite) Daniela Florescu
Re: Toss section 5 (create SOAP-lite) Scott Hinkelman
Re: Toss section 5 (create SOAP-lite) Roger L. Costello
Re: Toss section 5 (create SOAP-lite) Gaertner, Dr., Dietmar
Re: Toss section 5 (create SOAP-lite) Rich Salz
Re: Toss section 5 (create SOAP-lite) David Fallside
Re: Toss section 5 (create SOAP-lite) Bob Cunnings

Monday, 30 July 2001

Re: Toss section 5 (create SOAP-lite) Doug Davis
Proposed resolution: issues 78, 16 David Fallside
TBTF telcon draft minutes - 30 July 2001 Hugo Haas
Toss section 5 (create SOAP-lite) Roger L. Costello
Re: Two uses of SOAP Francis Norton
Re: TBTF: A distillation of sorts Mark Nottingham
RE: Bindings : a quick cut at an abstract definition Glen Daniels
RE: Bindings : a quick cut at an abstract definition Mountain, Highland M
(Fwd) Re: Two uses of SOAP Bob Cunnings
Re: Two uses of SOAP Frank D. Greco
RE: Bindings : a quick cut at an abstract definition Williams, Stuart
Re: Two uses of SOAP Kurt Cagle
Re: RPCTF: Should RPC be core or an extension ? -- A PROPOSAL Chuck Campbell
Re: Issue 107: Clarify the terms application, actor & related notions of identity. Marc Hadley
Re: Two uses of SOAP Frank D. Greco
RE: TBTF: A distillation of sorts Williams, Stuart
Bindings : a quick cut at an abstract definition Glen Daniels
Re: Two uses of SOAP Mark Baker

Sunday, 29 July 2001

Re: RPCTF: Should RPC be core or an extension ? Glen Daniels

Saturday, 28 July 2001

Re: Two uses of SOAP Kurt Cagle
Two uses of SOAP Mark Baker

Friday, 27 July 2001

Re: A tale of two bindings Mark Baker

Saturday, 28 July 2001

Re: A tale of two bindings Rich Salz

Friday, 27 July 2001

TBTF telcon minutes - 26 July 2001 Hugo Haas
Re: A tale of two bindings Mark Baker
Re: A tale of two bindings Mark Baker
clarifications on XML Schema base64Binary type C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
Re: A tale of two bindings Rich Salz
Re: A tale of two bindings Mark Baker
Re: TBTF: A distillation of sorts Glen Daniels
Re: TBTF: A distillation of sorts Doug Davis
RE: List of testable assertions in the SOAP Version 1.2 specification Kirill Gavrylyuk
Re: TBTF: A distillation of sorts Mark Nottingham

Thursday, 26 July 2001

Re: TBTF: A distillation of sorts christopher ferris
Re: TBTF: A distillation of sorts Mark Nottingham
Re: TBTF: Proposed Sections for Binding Specifications Mark Nottingham
Re: A tale of two bindings Mark Nottingham
Re: What is an independent element Jacek Kopecky
TBTF: A distillation of sorts Glen Daniels
Re: A tale of two bindings Rich Salz
Re: A tale of two bindings Mark Baker
Re: A tale of two bindings Mark Nottingham
Re: TBTF: Proposed Sections for Binding Specifications Hugo Haas
Re: A tale of two bindings Mark Baker
Re: A tale of two bindings Mark Baker

Wednesday, 25 July 2001

Schema update Philip DesAutels
Re: Issue 107: Clarify the terms application, actor & related notions of identity. Paul Denning
RPCTF: issues affected by removing dependencies on encoding from RPC Jacek Kopecky
Re: benchmarking SOAP? Aleksander Slominski
minutes of 11 and 18 July 2001 teleconferences Yves Lafon
RE: benchmarking SOAP? Syed Ahmad
RE: RPCTF: Should RPC be core or an extension ? Daniela Florescu
RE: A tale of two bindings Eugene Kuznetsov
RE: RPCTF: Issues 16 and 78 Frank DeRose
Re: benchmarking SOAP? Aleksander Slominski
Re: RPCTF: Should RPC be core or an extension ? Jacek Kopecky
RE: RPCTF: Issues 16 and 78 Jacek Kopecky
Re: A tale of two bindings Rich Salz
Re: A tale of two bindings Mark Baker
Re: RPCTF: Should RPC be core or an extension ? Rich Salz
Re: RPCTF: Should RPC be core or an extension ? Jacek Kopecky
Re: RPCTF: Should RPC be core or an extension ? Mark Nottingham
Re: RPCTF: Should RPC be core or an extension ? Marc Hadley
List of testable assertions in the SOAP Version 1.2 specification Hugo Haas
Re: RPCTF: Should RPC be core or an extension ? Francis Norton
Re: RPCTF: Should RPC be core or an extension ? christopher ferris
Some edits on the TBTF minutes Glen Daniels
Re: RPCTF: Should RPC be core or an extension ? Rich Salz
Re: RPCTF: Should RPC be core or an extension ? Jacek Kopecky
RE: Issue 107: Clarify the terms application, actor & related not ions of identity. Williams, Stuart
Re: A tale of two bindings Rich Salz
Re: A tale of two bindings Rich Salz
Re: A tale of two bindings Rich Salz
Re: RPCTF: Should RPC be core or an extension ? Scott Hinkelman
Re: RPCTF: Should RPC be core or an extension ? Jacek Kopecky
RE: A tale of two bindings Jacek Kopecky
Re: A tale of two bindings Jacek Kopecky
RPCTF: Should RPC be core or an extension ? John Ibbotson
Re: RPCTF: Issues 16 and 78 Marc Hadley

Tuesday, 24 July 2001

Re: A tale of two bindings Mark Baker
Re: A tale of two bindings David Crowley
Re: A tale of two bindings Mark Baker
RE: A tale of two bindings Eugene Kuznetsov
Re: A tale of two bindings Mark Baker
Re: another approach to status codes, etc. in HTTP binding Mark Baker
What is an independent element Murali Janakiraman
benchmarking SOAP? Mark Nottingham
RE: RPCTF: Issues 16 and 78 Frank DeRose
Re: RPCTF: Issues 16 and 78 christopher ferris
RPCTF: correlation extension proposal christopher ferris
Re: RPCTF: Referencing Header items from Body Mark Jones
Re: TBTF: SOAP over SMTP Binding Proposal - HTML Hugo Haas
Re: Issue 107: Clarify the terms application, actor & related notions of identity. Marc Hadley
Re: HTTP Extension Framwork in SOAP 1.2 John Ibbotson
Issue 107: Clarify the terms application, actor & related notions of identity. Eric Jenkins

Monday, 23 July 2001

Re: default fault destination Paul Denning
Re: [RPCTF] RPC as an application or an extension of SOAP? Paul Denning
[TBTF] Minutes of the 19 and 23 July telcons Hugo Haas
RPCTF: Issues 16 and 78 Frank DeRose
RPCTF: Referencing Header items from Body Frank DeRose
RPCTF: Relationship of Sections 5 and 7 in SOAP 1.2 Frank DeRose
Re: default fault destination Jacek Kopecky
Re: Processing which is not triggered by blocks? Jacek Kopecky
Re: A tale of two bindings Jacek Kopecky
[RPCTF] issues pertaining to RPC Jacek Kopecky
Re: A tale of two bindings Rich Salz
Re: another approach to status codes, etc. in HTTP binding Rich Salz

Saturday, 21 July 2001

how to send/receive dynamic xml file through servlet !! Arun Mahajan
A tale of two bindings Mark Baker
Re: Processing which is not triggered by blocks? Mark Nottingham
Re: new MU Fault header Doug Davis
Fw: new MU Fault header Glen Daniels
new MU Fault header Doug Davis
Re: Processing which is not triggered by blocks? Rich Salz
Re: Processing which is not triggered by blocks? christopher ferris
Processing which is not triggered by blocks? Glen Daniels
Re: revised 'loose' HTTP binding [CORRECTION] Mark Nottingham
revised 'loose' HTTP binding Mark Nottingham

Friday, 20 July 2001

default fault destination Mark Nottingham
Re: another approach to status codes, etc. in HTTP binding Mark Baker
Re: another approach to status codes, etc. in HTTP binding Mark Baker
Minute of RPC Task force teleconference Yves Lafon
Re: another approach to status codes, etc. in HTTP binding Rich Salz
TBTF: Proposed Sections for Binding Specifications Mountain, Highland M
FYI: SOAP "Bar BoF" at IETF Mark Nottingham
Issue 99 : Proposed resolution Glen Daniels
[RPCTF] RPC as an application or an extension of SOAP? Jacek Kopecky
Re: another approach to status codes, etc. in HTTP binding Rich Salz
Re: another approach to status codes, etc. in HTTP binding Mark Baker
Re: TBTF: nesting Rich Salz
Re: another approach to status codes, etc. in HTTP binding Mark Baker
Re: TBTF: nesting Mark Nottingham
Re: another approach to status codes, etc. in HTTP binding Mark Nottingham
Re: another approach to status codes, etc. in HTTP binding christopher ferris
Re: another approach to status codes, etc. in HTTP binding Mark Nottingham
Re: another approach to status codes, etc. in HTTP binding christopher ferris
Re: another approach to status codes, etc. in HTTP binding Mark Baker
Re: TBTF: nesting christopher ferris
Re: TBTF: nesting Mark Nottingham
Re: TBTF: nesting christopher ferris
Re: TBTF: nesting Mark Nottingham
Re: TBTF: nesting Rich Salz
Re: another approach to status codes, etc. in HTTP binding Rich Salz

Thursday, 19 July 2001

TBTF: nesting Mark Nottingham
Re: another approach to status codes, etc. in HTTP binding christopher ferris
Re: another approach to status codes, etc. in HTTP binding Mark Nottingham
Re: another approach to status codes, etc. in HTTP binding Jacek Kopecky
Re: another approach to status codes, etc. in HTTP binding Mark Baker
Re: another approach to status codes, etc. in HTTP binding Mark Baker
Re: another approach to status codes, etc. in HTTP binding Jacek Kopecky
RE: TBTF: SOAP over SMTP Binding Proposal - HTML Mountain, Highland M
Re: another approach to status codes, etc. in HTTP binding Mark Baker
Re: TBTF: SOAP over SMTP Binding Proposal - HTML Hugo Haas
Re: another approach to status codes, etc. in HTTP binding Rich Salz
Re: another approach to status codes, etc. in HTTP binding Mark Baker
Re: another approach to status codes, etc. in HTTP binding christopher ferris
Re: another approach to status codes, etc. in HTTP binding Jacek Kopecky
Re: another approach to status codes, etc. in HTTP binding Rich Salz
Re: another approach to status codes, etc. in HTTP binding Mark Baker
TBTF: SOAP over SMTP Binding Proposal - HTML Mountain, Highland M
Re: another approach to status codes, etc. in HTTP binding Rich Salz
Re: infoset and bindings Mark Jones
Re: another approach to status codes, etc. in HTTP binding Mark Baker
Re: another approach to status codes, etc. in HTTP binding Mark Baker
Re: another approach to status codes, etc. in HTTP binding Mark Baker
Re: [ANN] 2001 XML Schema compliant SOAP 1.1 schemas Martin Gudgin
Re: another approach to status codes, etc. in HTTP binding Rich Salz
RE: TBTF: nature of transport bindings Oisin Hurley
Re: TBTF: nature of transport bindings christopher ferris
Re: another approach to status codes, etc. in HTTP binding christopher ferris
Re: Issue 100 (MustUnderstand fault caused by block addressed to anot her node) Marc Hadley
RE XML-RPC Richard Featherstone
Re: another approach to status codes, etc. in HTTP binding Mark Baker
Re: Issue 100 (MustUnderstand fault caused by block addressed to anot her node) Rich Salz
Re: another approach to status codes, etc. in HTTP binding Rich Salz
Re: infoset and bindings Mark Nottingham
Re: another approach to status codes, etc. in HTTP binding Mark Nottingham

Wednesday, 18 July 2001

RE: another approach to status codes, etc. in HTTP binding Mountain, Highland M
Re: another approach to status codes, etc. in HTTP binding Mark Baker
TBTF: nature of transport bindings Mark Nottingham
Re: another approach to status codes, etc. in HTTP binding Mark Nottingham
RE: another approach to status codes, etc. in HTTP binding Mark Baker
Issue 100 (MustUnderstand fault caused by block addressed to anot her node) Glen Daniels
Proposed resolution to issue #102 Jacek Kopecky
Re: another approach to status codes, etc. in HTTP binding Mark Baker
RE: another approach to status codes, etc. in HTTP binding Eamon O'Tuathail
Re: another approach to status codes, etc. in HTTP binding Mark Baker
Re: another approach to status codes, etc. in HTTP binding Mark Nottingham
proposed re-write of http binding christopher ferris
Re: another approach to status codes, etc. in HTTP binding David Crowley
Re: another approach to status codes, etc. in HTTP binding Mark Nottingham
Re: Binding example discussion christopher ferris
Re: another approach to status codes, etc. in HTTP binding Mark Baker
Re: another approach to status codes, etc. in HTTP binding christopher ferris
Re: Binding example discussion Mark Baker
Re: another approach to status codes, etc. in HTTP binding Mark Nottingham
SOAP over TCP/IP Oisin Hurley
Re: another approach to status codes, etc. in HTTP binding Mark Nottingham
Re: another approach to status codes, etc. in HTTP binding Doug Davis
Re: another approach to status codes, etc. in HTTP binding Mark Baker
Re: another approach to status codes, etc. in HTTP binding christopher ferris
Re: another approach to status codes, etc. in HTTP binding Mark Nottingham
SOAP over SMTP - Rough Draft Mountain, Highland M
Re: another approach to status codes, etc. in HTTP binding Mark Baker
Re: Binding example discussion Rich Salz
Re: Binding example discussion Mark Nottingham
Re: Binding example discussion Mark Nottingham
Re: Binding example discussion christopher ferris
Re: Binding example discussion Mark Nottingham
Re: another approach to status codes, etc. in HTTP binding Mark Nottingham
Re: another approach to status codes, etc. in HTTP binding Mark Nottingham
Re: Binding example discussion Mark Baker
Re: another approach to status codes, etc. in HTTP binding David Crowley
Re: another approach to status codes, etc. in HTTP binding christopher ferris
Re: Binding example discussion Mark Baker
another approach to status codes, etc. in HTTP binding Mark Nottingham
Re: Binding example discussion Mark Nottingham
Re: Binding example discussion Mark Nottingham
Re: Binding example discussion christopher ferris
Re: Binding example discussion Marc Hadley
RE: HTTP Extension Framwork in SOAP 1.2 Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
Use of xml:lang incompatible with SOAP encoding? Michael Brennan
Re: Binding example discussion Mark Nottingham
Re: HTTP Extension Framwork in SOAP 1.2 Mark Nottingham

Tuesday, 17 July 2001

HTTP Extension Framwork in SOAP 1.2 David Fallside
Re: Binding example discussion Mark Baker
Minutes of the 13 July protocol binding TF telcon Hugo Haas
Binding example discussion Mark Nottingham
issues related to bindings christopher ferris
Re: SOAP & unmarshalling inline Doug Davis
SOAP & unmarshalling inline james anderson
Re: SOAP Schemas reproduction Martin Gudgin

Monday, 16 July 2001

Re: SOAP Schemas reproduction David Fallside
SOAP Schemas reproduction Elliotte Rusty Harold
Re: Comments on XML Encryption Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
Re: infoset and bindings Mark Jones
RE: Publication of the first W3C Working Drafts of SOAP Version 1.2 and of the XML Protocol Abstract Model Frank DeRose

Sunday, 15 July 2001

Comments on XML Encryption Orchard, David

Friday, 13 July 2001

RE: Publication of the first W3C Working Drafts of SOAP Version 1.2 and of the XML Protocol Abstract Model Andrew Layman
Unsolicited messages server to client with HTTP binding Arie Golos
Re: Publication of the first W3C Working Drafts of SOAP Version 1.2 and of the XML Protocol Abstract Model David Fallside
Re: Summary of the binding discussion (was Re: Protocol Bindings) Hugo Haas
Re: Publication of the first W3C Working Drafts of SOAP Version 1.2 and of the XML Protocol Abstract Model Bob Cunnings
RE: Summary of the binding discussion (was Re: Protocol Bindings) Williams, Stuart
Re: base64 encoding Rich Salz

Thursday, 12 July 2001

base64 encoding David Fallside

Friday, 13 July 2001

Re: Summary of the binding discussion (was Re: Protocol Bindings) christopher ferris

Thursday, 12 July 2001

RE: Summary of the binding discussion (was Re: Protocol Bindings) Michael Brennan
Summary of the binding discussion (was Re: Protocol Bindings) Hugo Haas
RE: SOAP and OO: Dynamic Services Krishna Sankar
RE: Protocol Bindings Yves Lafon
Re: Infoset based rewrite of SOAP Section 4 Rich Salz
Re: Protocol Bindings Mark Nottingham

Monday, 2 July 2001

Re: Infoset based rewrite of SOAP Section 4 Sean McGrath

Thursday, 12 July 2001

RE: Protocol Bindings Williams, Stuart
RE: Protocol Bindings Williams, Stuart
RE: Protocol Bindings Williams, Stuart
Re: Protocol Bindings christopher ferris
Re: Protocol Bindings Jean-Jacques Moreau

Wednesday, 11 July 2001

Python to bake-in XML-RPC support Dave Winer
Re: Protocol Bindings christopher ferris
RE: Protocol Bindings Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
RE: SOAP and OO: Dynamic Services Andrew Layman
Re: SOAP and OO: Dynamic Services Aleksander Slominski
RE: Protocol Bindings Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
RE: Protocol Bindings Williams, Stuart
SOAP and OO: Dynamic Services Ben Peacock
Re: Infoset based rewrite of SOAP Section 4 Rich Salz
Re: Infoset based rewrite of SOAP Section 4 Jean-Jacques Moreau
Re: Protocol Bindings Jean-Jacques Moreau

Tuesday, 10 July 2001

RE: Protocol Bindings laird

Wednesday, 11 July 2001

RE: Protocol Bindings Williams, Stuart
Re: Protocol Bindings Jean-Jacques Moreau

Tuesday, 10 July 2001

Re: Protocol Bindings Mark Nottingham
xml tranformation through asp and xsl puja
[ANN] 2001 XML Schema compliant SOAP 1.1 schemas Martin Gudgin
Re: 2000 Schemas for SOAP 1.1 Martin Gudgin
RE: Protocol Bindings Williams, Stuart
Re: 2000 Schemas for SOAP 1.1 Rich Salz
2000 Schemas for SOAP 1.1 Martin Gudgin

Monday, 9 July 2001

Re: infoset and bindings Mark Nottingham
RE: Protocol Bindings Krishna Sankar
Publication of the first W3C Working Drafts of SOAP Version 1.2 and of the XML Protocol Abstract Model Hugo Haas
RE: Protocol Bindings Williams, Stuart
RE: Protocol Bindings Williams, Stuart

Sunday, 8 July 2001

Re: Protocol Bindings Marshall T. Rose
Re: Protocol Bindings Rich Salz
RE: Protocol Bindings Eamon O'Tuathail
Re: Protocol Bindings Mark Nottingham
RE: Protocol Bindings Eamon O'Tuathail
RE: Protocol Bindings Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
RE: Protocol Bindings Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
RE: Protocol Bindings Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
RE: Protocol Bindings Eamon O'Tuathail
Re: Protocol Bindings Marshall T. Rose
RE: Protocol Bindings Henrik Frystyk Nielsen

Saturday, 7 July 2001

Re: Protocol Bindings Mark Nottingham
RE: Protocol Bindings Eamon O'Tuathail
Re: Protocol Bindings Mark Nottingham

Friday, 6 July 2001

Re: Protocol Bindings Mark Baker
Re: Protocol Bindings Mark Nottingham
Re: Protocol Bindings Marc Hadley
RE: Protocol Bindings Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
RE: Protocol Bindings Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
RE: Protocol Bindings Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
RE: Protocol Bindings Williams, Stuart
RE: Protocol Bindings Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
Protocol Bindings Maggie Cusack
RE: Protocol Bindings Eamon O'Tuathail
RE: Protocol Bindings Williams, Stuart
RE: Protocol Bindings Williams, Stuart
[xml-dist-app] <none> Ext-Shaun.OHagan@nokia.com
RE: Protocol Bindings Williams, Stuart

Thursday, 5 July 2001

ODBC/JDBC interface over SOAP? Dan Brickley
RE: Protocol Bindings Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
RE: Protocol Bindings Henrik Frystyk Nielsen

Friday, 6 July 2001

Re: Protocol Bindings Mark Nottingham
Re: Protocol Bindings Mark Nottingham
Re: Protocol Bindings Mark Nottingham

Thursday, 5 July 2001

RE: Protocol Bindings Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
Re: Protocol Bindings Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com
RE: Protocol Bindings Eamon O'Tuathail
RE: Protocol Bindings Williams, Stuart
Re: Protocol Bindings christopher ferris
[xml-dist-app] <none> Ext-Shaun.OHagan@nokia.com
Re: Protocol Bindings christopher ferris
RE: Protocol Bindings Williams, Stuart
RE: Protocol Bindings Williams, Stuart
RE: Protocol Bindings Williams, Stuart
Re: Protocol Bindings Marc Hadley
Re: Protocol Bindings Marc Hadley
RE: Protocol Bindings Eamon O'Tuathail
SOAP over BEEP - updated draft available Eamon O'Tuathail
RE: Protocol Bindings Krishna Sankar
Re: Protocol Bindings Mark Nottingham
RE: Protocol Bindings Henrik Frystyk Nielsen

Tuesday, 3 July 2001

Protocol Bindings Williams, Stuart
Re: Infoset based rewrite of SOAP Section 4 Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com

Monday, 2 July 2001

Re: Infoset based rewrite of SOAP Section 4 Mark Nottingham
Re: Infoset based rewrite of SOAP Section 4 Doug Davis
Re: Infoset based rewrite of SOAP Section 4 james anderson
Re: Infoset based rewrite of SOAP Section 4 Mark Nottingham
Re: Infoset based rewrite of SOAP Section 4 Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com
Re: Infoset based rewrite of SOAP Section 4 Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com
Re: Infoset based rewrite of SOAP Section 4 Rich Salz
what effect will SOAP have on EAI ? ali kazmi
Re: Infoset based rewrite of SOAP Section 4 Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com
Re: Infoset based rewrite of SOAP Section 4 Mark Nottingham
Re: Infoset based rewrite of SOAP Section 4 Rich Salz
Re: Infoset based rewrite of SOAP Section 4 Rich Salz

Last message date: Tuesday, 31 July 2001 18:17:13 UTC