- From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 08:59:27 +0200
- To: christopher ferris <chris.ferris@east.sun.com>
- CC: xml-dist-app@w3.org
So you're saying a binding could be considered as a local intermediary? (or maybe some bindings only?) Jean-Jacques. christopher ferris wrote: > [...] > Secondly, if I correctly understand Henrik's position a binding > MAY actually transform the message by inserting headers which > relate information that is not contained within the message, > but is available to the software that effects the binding. > e.g. the "binding" may actually perform as an actor in the SOAP > sense. Conversely, a binding may consume header blocks that > are targetted to it, thus effectively transforming the message. > [...]
Received on Thursday, 12 July 2001 02:59:33 UTC