- From: Jacek Kopecky <jacek@idoox.com>
- Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 20:20:47 +0200 (CEST)
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- cc: XML Distributed Applications List <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Mark,
I think that we can distinguish one more layer here - the
message pattern. So we have SOAP Application using a Message
Pattern using a Transport. I think the appropriate place for
specifying fault delivery is in the Message Pattern layer,
whichever of the pair Application/Protocol Binding happens to
specify it.
Jacek Kopecky
Idoox
http://www.idoox.com/
On Fri, 20 Jul 2001, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>
> In some proposals for a transport binding, there's a notion of a
> default fault destination; e.g., "when using HTTP, deliver any faults
> generated back to the client."
>
> I'm wondering if it's more appropriate to define this in the SOAP
> application (e.g. RPC), and leave the transport agnostic about fault
> delivery.
>
> Thoughts?
>
>
>
Received on Monday, 23 July 2001 14:20:49 UTC