- From: Rich Salz <rsalz@zolera.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 13:22:20 -0400
- To: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@propylon.com>
- CC: xml-dist-app@w3.org
> Unfortunately, given the data-model-free nature of XML 1.0 and the > hairy complexity of fully-blown post-parse XML 1.0, abstract > infoset approaches are probably unavoidable - unless one goes > for commonXML, microXML or so other syntactic restriction of > XML 1.0. I don't understand the argument: I don't need a data model to implement a netowrk protocol. Nor am I alone, as there are a couple-dozen increasingly-interoperable SOAP implementations to further argue the point. (Not to mention the countless SAX and DOM implementations.) /r$ -- Zolera Systems, Your Key to Online Integrity Securing Web services: XML, SOAP, Signatures, Encryption http://www.zolera.com
Received on Thursday, 12 July 2001 13:21:56 UTC