- From: Martin Gudgin <marting@develop.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 13:16:16 +0100
- To: "Rich Salz" <rsalz@zolera.com>
- Cc: "XML Protocol Discussion" <xml-dist-app@w3.org>, "soapbuilders" <soapbuilders@yahoogroups.com>
Of course, the subject should read 2001... Gudge ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rich Salz" <rsalz@zolera.com> To: "Martin Gudgin" <marting@develop.com> Cc: "XML Protocol Discussion" <xml-dist-app@w3.org>; "soapbuilders" <soapbuilders@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 1:06 PM Subject: Re: 2000 Schemas for SOAP 1.1 > > I know we produced schemas for SOAP 1.2 that are compliant with the XML > > Schema Rec. > > > > Would it be useful to produce similar schemas for SOAP 1.1? > > > > Martin Gudgin > > DevelopMentor > > Yes, most definitely. In fact, most SOAP interop testing that is going > on these days seems to be focused on using the official CR (even though > the spec explicitly references a particular draft version). > Particularly useful would be nailing down all the "aliases" that the > SOAP encoding provides (SOAP-ENC:duration, etc.) > > /r$ > > -- > Zolera Systems, Securing web services (XML, SOAP, Signatures, > Encryption) > http://www.zolera.com
Received on Tuesday, 10 July 2001 08:18:07 UTC