- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@akamai.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 11:29:13 -0700
- To: christopher ferris <chris.ferris@east.sun.com>
- Cc: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>, Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@Sun.COM>, XML Distributed Applications List <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 02:25:22PM -0400, christopher ferris wrote: > > Agreed. However, in the case of SOAP-RPC, or more precisely, the > request/response MEP, the binding specification would need to say > something to the effect that a 202 Accepted status code MUST NOT be > returned. Or, perhaps, that implicit correlation is available only when a SOAP envelope is present in both the HTTP request and HTTP response messages. -- Mark Nottingham, Research Scientist Akamai Technologies (San Mateo, CA USA)
Received on Wednesday, 18 July 2001 14:29:14 UTC