Re: RPCTF: Should RPC be core or an extension ?

+1 to what Jacek wrote.

I supose this means that Sec5 should be moved into a separate document,
too? Or -- for interoperability purposes -- should we require all SOAP
implementations to understand sec5 encoding?

> +1 with Marc's change. I wasn't against visibly removing RPC from
> the core of SOAP, I just didn't like the term "extension" used
> here. 8-)

-- 
Zolera Systems, Your Key to Online Integrity
Securing Web services: XML, SOAP, Dig-sig, Encryption
http://www.zolera.com

Received on Wednesday, 25 July 2001 13:15:27 UTC