- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 09:05:55 -0700
- To: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Cc: christopher ferris <chris.ferris@east.sun.com>, xml-dist-app@w3.org
How does Expect help in this situation? On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 10:26:35AM -0700, Mark Baker wrote: > Oops, hit send prematurely. I'll just respond to the one point I missed. > > 7/19/2001 3:20:30 AM, christopher ferris <chris.ferris@east.sun.com> wrote: > > >Mark, > > > >Okay, if we take this approach (reuse application semantics) > >to its fullest interpretation, then yes, SOAP Server.* faults > >would be reported using 500 and possibly MustUnderstand.* > >faults (of course, depending upon your perspective, either > >the client is at fault for including a header that the server > >doesn't understand or the server is at fault for not understanding > >the header;-). > > Yah, I got a headache over this one at first too until I looked at the Expect feature of HTTP 1.1. Then all was made > clear; it is within the capabilities of the client to resubmit the request without mustUnderstand="1". The server doesn't > have a choice. > > MB > -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Thursday, 19 July 2001 17:51:38 UTC