- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@akamai.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 12:36:24 -0700
- To: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: David Crowley <dcrowley@scitegic.com>, xml-dist-app@w3.org
Agree - 500 is a hint that HTTP implementations will believe they can act authoritatively upon. It's misleading; an HTTP server error is not the same as a SOAP server error. On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 03:27:42PM -0400, Doug Davis wrote: > Isn't this a lot like what happens when you fail to log into something like > yahoo? > >From HTTP's point of view it was a successful request (200 status code) > but the body of the messages says "login failed". > -Dug > > > David Crowley <dcrowley@scitegic.com>@w3.org on 07/18/2001 01:51:55 PM > > Sent by: xml-dist-app-request@w3.org > > > To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@akamai.com> > cc: xml-dist-app@w3.org > Subject: Re: another approach to status codes, etc. in HTTP binding > > > > At 10:12 AM 7/18/2001, you wrote: > > > > In other words, I think we should allow SOAP applications to use HTTP > > > with all the bells and whistles that HTTP provides including using all > > > status codes and header fields. In other words, let HTTP be HTTP :) > > > >What I'm hearing, then, is that the HTTP binding (and bindings in > >general) should be expansive; e.g., > > > >* SOAP envelopes can be encapsulated in request messages which have a > > method which permits an entity body (i.e., POST, PUT) > > > >* SOAP envelopes can be encapsulated in response messsages which have > > a status code which permits an entity body (i.e., 200, 400, 500, > > etc.) > > > While I _absolutely_ agree with "let HTTP be HTTP," I am concerned about > SOAP responses being in any response message other than 2xx. We should not > mix _protocol_ errors with SOAP errors. SOAP has a way of dealing with > errors through the SOAP Fault. Just because SOAP returns a fault, doesn't > mean that HTTP (or any other underlying protocol) should signal an > error. It's not an error with the underlying protocol. > > Specifically, requiring an error code 500 for a SOAP Fault, IMHO, is just > plain wrong. Internal Error 500 - "The server encountered an unexpected > condition which prevented it from fulfilling the request." If the server > returns a valid SOAP Fault message, then the server absolutely fulfilled > the request. > > > -- Mark Nottingham, Research Scientist Akamai Technologies (San Mateo, CA USA)
Received on Wednesday, 18 July 2001 15:36:26 UTC