RE: Summary of the binding discussion (was Re: Protocol Bindings)

Hugo,

Thanks for taking the time to do this.

One small glitch:

	From: "Williams, Stuart" <skw@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
	Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 12:48:45 +0100 
	Subject: RE: Protocol Bindings
	Message-ID:
<5E13A1874524D411A876006008CD059F192511@0-mail-1.hpl.hp.com>
	The SOAP/XMLP application should not be aware of the capabilities of
what it is underneath...	

The emphasis in [1] was "...should not have to be aware..." one word
different.

Thanks again,

Stuart

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2001Jul/0022.html

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hugo Haas [mailto:hugo@w3.org]
> Sent: 12 July 2001 23:39
> To: xml-dist-app@w3.org
> Subject: Summary of the binding discussion (was Re: Protocol Bindings)
> 
> 
> Since I was losing track of all the arguments/questions seen in this
> thread, I tried to make a summary of the thread:
> 
>       http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/1/07/12-transport-binding
> 
> I am making this publicly available in case somebody would find that
> useful.
> 
> Note that this is my interpretation of the emails, so the summaries
> might not reflect adequately what the author was trying to say.  Feel
> free to send corrections/additions.
> 
> I need to add links to the mail archive but I am running short on
> time, so I will take care of that later. 
> 
> -- 
> Hugo Haas - W3C
> mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/ - 
> tel:+1-617-452-2092
>

Received on Friday, 13 July 2001 06:24:49 UTC