- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@akamai.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 11:20:37 -0700
- To: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Cc: Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com>, XML Distributed Applications List <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 01:52:12PM -0400, Mark Baker wrote: > > > There is one issue on this topic that may require some work on our > part though; supporting an HTTP 203 (Accepted) response code. > Should a SOAP message be POSTed over HTTP and the server responds > with a 203, the correlation between request and response has now > been broken. Do we want/need to say anything about how an > application can determine correlation when the response is returned > through some other means? At a minimum I think we should say that > other mechanisms can be used on top of SOAP (say, a transaction > header block), but that the HTTP binding does not define such a > mechanism. Agreed. This caveat might be appropriate in the binding definition itself, or in a general binding discussion. -- Mark Nottingham, Research Scientist Akamai Technologies (San Mateo, CA USA)
Received on Wednesday, 18 July 2001 14:20:39 UTC