Thursday, 30 September 1999
Wednesday, 29 September 1999
- a new article about an exciting piece of reborne technology
- Re: Search forms for text-oriented/request for advice
- Re: Search forms for text-oriented/request for advice
- Re: Search forms for text-oriented/request for advice
Tuesday, 28 September 1999
- Re: make Macromedia Flash Accessible
- make Macromedia Flash Accessible
- Fwd: Web Design Accessibility is Cool
Monday, 27 September 1999
Friday, 24 September 1999
- Re: Fw: Hack this site, win a cool grand
- Re: a new wave of disturbing possibilities?
- Re: a new wave of disturbing possibilities?
- Re: a new wave of disturbing possibilities?
- a new wave of disturbing possibilities?
Thursday, 23 September 1999
Tuesday, 21 September 1999
Wednesday, 22 September 1999
- WORM ALERT: C:\CoolProgs\Pretty Park.exe
- [Fwd: [webwatch] Interested in making your sites accessible to more?]
Monday, 20 September 1999
- "Accessibility Features of SMIL" available as W3C Note
- [Fwd: Desktop Software Via the Web]
- [w3c-wai-ig] <none>
Sunday, 19 September 1999
- Re: Visible, simple, accessible sites
- Re: Visible, simple, accessible sites
- Re: Visible, simple, accessible sites
- Re: examples of accessible e-commerce sites
- Re: Visible, simple, accessible sites
Saturday, 18 September 1999
Friday, 17 September 1999
- Re: Visible, simple, accessible sites
- Re: Visible, simple, accessible sites
- Re: examples of accessible e-commerce sites
- Re: Visible, simple, accessible sites
- Re: examples of accessible e-commerce sites
- examples of accessible e-commerce sites
- Gov. Davis of CA Signs bill requiring publishers to provide elect ronic texts
- Visible, simple, accessible sites
Thursday, 16 September 1999
- Re: Which form item is more accessible?
- CA Higher ED Requires Compliance with W3C Guidelines
- [Fwd: Advice needed for designer of government web site]
- Re: Which form item is more accessible?
- Re: Which form item is more accessible?
- Waddell Web Access Article Cited by Australian Commission
Wednesday, 15 September 1999
- [Fwd: web peeves]
- [Fwd: NEW: sols-webware]
- Re: Which form item is more accessible?
- Re: Which form item is more accessible?
- Re: Which form item is more accessible?
- Re: Which form item is more accessible?
- Adoption of Accessible Long Distance Learning Guidelines
Tuesday, 14 September 1999
- Re: Which form item is more accessible?
- Re: Which form item is more accessible?
- Which form item is more accessible?
- North Carolina Announces Web Access Task Force
Thursday, 9 September 1999
- Re: Fwd: Re: I will not buy and why?
- Re: 19 clicks to anywhere on the web
- 19 clicks to anywhere on the web
- Re: kiosks again?
- Re: kiosks again?
- Re: kiosks again?
Wednesday, 8 September 1999
Tuesday, 7 September 1999
- Re: [Fwd: XML is coming]
- Re: [Fwd: XML is coming]
- IMPORTANT: Need techniques for User Agent Accessibility Guidelines
- Re: RE: How to describe Flowcharts, Schematics, etc
- [Fwd: Re: I will not buy and why?]
Monday, 6 September 1999
- Re: Heads up: Last Call for Authoring Accessibility
- Re: Heads up: Last Call for Authoring Tool Accessibility Guidelines
- for those looking for embedable speech
- Re: Heads up: Last Call for Authoring Tool Accessibility Guidelines
Sunday, 5 September 1999
- [w3c-wai-ig] <none>
- RE: How to describe Flowcharts, Schematics, etc
- Re: Statistics on Blind & Visually Impaired Web Users
Saturday, 4 September 1999
- A site to watch.
- RE: Statistics on Blind & Visually Impaired Web Users
- RE: Statistics on Blind & Visually Impaired Web Users
- RE: Statistics on Blind & Visually Impaired Web Users
- Re: Heads up: Last Call for Authoring Tool Accessibility Guidelines
Friday, 3 September 1999
- [Fwd: I will not buy and why?]
- Re: Statistics on Blind & Visually Impaired Web Users
- Re: Statistics on Blind & Visually Impaired Web Users
- Re: Statistics on Blind & Visually Impaired Web Users
- RE: How to describe Flowcharts, Schematics, etc
- Heads up: Last Call for Authoring Tool Accessibility Guidelines
- Statistics on Blind & Visually Impaired Web Users
- Re: Fwd: NetMechanic Results on www.hwg.org
- Ordering a copy of the "Tape Recording Manual" (previously "I have found the mother lode")
- Re: I have found the mother lode! (previously this thread was called "How to describe Flowcharts, Schematics, etc" on the wai-IG list)
- RE: Fwd: NetMechanic Results on www.hwg.org
- Re: Fwd: NetMechanic Results on www.hwg.org
- Re: Fwd: NetMechanic Results on www.hwg.org
- Fwd: NetMechanic Results on www.hwg.org
Thursday, 2 September 1999
- I have found the mother lode! (previously this thread was called "How to describe Flowcharts, Schematics, etc" on the wai-IG list)
- EASI course on web design
Wednesday, 1 September 1999
- appropriate reference card for blind web page designers?
- [Fwd: NEW: Authoring XHTML]
- Re: [Fwd: Guidelines for making web notes accessible]
- Re: [Fwd: Guidelines for making web notes accessible]
- Re: Braille formatter for XML-tagged data
- Re: [Fwd: Guidelines for making web notes accessible]
- Column: John Williams at Businessweek
- Braille formatter for XML-tagged data
- Re: [Fwd: Guidelines for making web notes accessible]
- [Fwd: Accessible Videos via the web . . .]
Tuesday, 31 August 1999
- Re: [Fwd: WEB: accessible www.electrichoice.com]
- Media: Accessibility Article on evolt
- Re: a bit of html help
- Re: [Fwd: Guidelines for making web notes accessible]
- Re: [Fwd: Guidelines for making web notes accessible]
- Re: [Fwd: Guidelines for making web notes accessible]
- Re: [Fwd: Guidelines for making web notes accessible]
- a bit of html help
- ISdAC forum list
- [Fwd: Guidelines for making web notes accessible]
- Re: [Fwd: WEB: accessible www.electrichoice.com]
Monday, 30 August 1999
- RE: lynx-dev User Agent
- RE: How to describe Flowcharts, Schematics, etc
- [Fwd: WEB: accessible www.electrichoice.com]
- RE: How to describe Flowcharts, Schematics, etc
Sunday, 29 August 1999
- Re: lynx-dev User Agent
- proceedings
- Re: How to describe Flowcharts, Schematics, etc
- Re: How to describe Flowcharts, Schematics, etc
- Re: How to describe Flowcharts, Schematics, etc
- "clockwork orange"? was: How to describe Flowcharts, Schematics, etc
- Re: How to describe Flowcharts, Schematics, etc
Saturday, 28 August 1999
- Re: How to describe Flowcharts, Schematics, etc
- Re: How to describe Flowcharts, Schematics, etc
- Re: How to describe Flowcharts, Schematics, etc
Friday, 27 August 1999
- Re: How to describe Flowcharts, Schematics, etc
- RE: How to describe Flowcharts, Schematics, etc
- RE: How to describe Flowcharts, Schematics, etc
Saturday, 28 August 1999
Friday, 27 August 1999
Saturday, 28 August 1999
Friday, 27 August 1999
- Re: x-disability comms, was How to describe Flowcharts, Schematics, etc
- Re: How to describe Flowcharts, Schematics, etc
- RE: lynx-dev User Agent
- Re: x-disability comms, was How to describe Flowcharts, Schematics, etc
- Re: color orange
- Re: color orange
- Re: How to describe Flowcharts, Schematics, etc
- x-disability comms, was How to describe Flowcharts, Schematics, etc
Wednesday, 25 August 1999
Thursday, 26 August 1999
- Re: lynx-dev User Agent
- CSS2 Accessibility Improvements
- Re: Tree model integrity (fwd)
- "usability label" like "nutrional label" for software
- Re: color orange
- [Fwd: XML is coming]
Wednesday, 25 August 1999
- Unsubcribe
- Tree model integrity (fwd)
- Re: How to describe Flowcharts, Schematics, etc
- Re: How to describe Flowcharts, Schematics, etc
- Re: [Fwd: NEW: AACP - American Association of Computer Programmers]
Thursday, 26 August 1999
Wednesday, 25 August 1999
- Re: How to describe Flowcharts, Schematics, etc
- Re: color orange
- Re: color orange
- Re: RE: comprehensive list of authoring tools?
- RE: comprehensive list of authoring tools?
- Re: color orange
- RE: color orange
- Re: color orange
- Comprehensive list of "graphical representations of text" formats/tools?
- Re: lynx-dev User Agent
- RE: comprehensive list of authoring tools?
Tuesday, 24 August 1999
Monday, 23 August 1999
- Re: comprehensive list of authoring tools?
- Re: comprehensive list of authoring tools?
- Re: comprehensive list of authoring tools?
- Re: comprehensive list of authoring tools?
Tuesday, 24 August 1999
Sunday, 22 August 1999
Saturday, 21 August 1999
Sunday, 22 August 1999
- Re: I submit it to you? [Fwd: Re: Help with a Website]
- Re: I submit it to you? [Fwd: Re: Help with a Website]
- Re: I submit it to you? [Fwd: Re: Help with a Website]
Saturday, 21 August 1999
Friday, 20 August 1999
Saturday, 21 August 1999
Wednesday, 4 August 1999
Friday, 20 August 1999
- Try out this reporting tool for accessibility problems
- Re: How to describe Flowcharts, Schematics, etc
- JavaOne trip report: Accessibility goes mainstream
Thursday, 19 August 1999
- Re: How to describe Flowcharts, Schematics, etc
- Re: Exemplary Site?
- Exemplary Site?
- Re: How to describe Flowcharts, Schematics, etc
- Re: How to describe Flowcharts, Schematics, etc
- Re: acronyms and character entity set codes
- Re: acronyms and character entity set codes
Wednesday, 18 August 1999
- acronyms and character entity set codes
- Re: How to describe Flowcharts, Schematics, etc
- Re: How to describe Flowcharts, Schematics, etc
Tuesday, 17 August 1999
- Re: How to describe Flowcharts, Schematics, etc
- Re: How to describe Flowcharts, Schematics, etc
- Re: How to describe Flowcharts, Schematics, etc
Monday, 16 August 1999
- How to describe Flowcharts, Schematics, etc
- Re: How to describe Flowcharts, Schematics, etc
- [Fwd: java empowers blind developers]
- imagemap alt question responses
- [w3c-wai-ig] <none>
Sunday, 15 August 1999
Saturday, 14 August 1999
Sunday, 8 August 1999
Saturday, 14 August 1999
Friday, 13 August 1999
- Re: How to describe Flowcharts, Schematics, etc
- Re: Fw: discouraging news from ToolBook and MIT
- Re: How to describe Flowcharts, Schematics, etc
Thursday, 12 August 1999
- NUNCA DEJE DE APRENDER
- Re: How to describe Flowcharts, Schematics, etc
- Re: How to describe Flowcharts, Schematics, etc
- size of check boxes answers
- New Scientist article on software to lip-read
Wednesday, 11 August 1999
- Re: How to describe Flowcharts, Schematics, etc
- Re: Can end users turn off CSS?
- Re: Can end users turn off CSS?
- Re: Do style sheets have any effect on screen readers?
- Re: Can end users turn off CSS?
- Can end users turn off CSS?
- How to describe Flowcharts, Schematics, etc
- Do style sheets have any effect on screen readers?
- RE: [Fwd: Re: Adobe article on accessibility]
- way to go kim![Fwd: The Salt Lake Tribune: Screen-Reader Technology Makes InternetAccessible to Blind]
- critical? size of check boxes
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Adobe article on accessibility]
Tuesday, 10 August 1999
- RE: [Fwd: Re: Adobe article on accessibility]
- RE: [Fwd: Re: Adobe article on accessibility]
- RE: [Fwd: Re: Adobe article on accessibility]
- [Fwd: Re: Adobe article on accessibility]
Monday, 9 August 1999
Sunday, 8 August 1999
Saturday, 7 August 1999
Friday, 6 August 1999
- Re: Insight from Web Experts?
- Insight from Web Experts?
- A New Screen Reader? (fwd)
- [Fwd: RE: From Access-USA -> Braille & More!]
Thursday, 5 August 1999
- Re: [Fwd: From Access-USA -> Braille & More!]
- research on moving images
- Re: Review request
- [Fwd: From Access-USA -> Braille & More!]
- Re: [Fwd: [webwatch] Announcement: The WYFIWYG Web Site]
- [Fwd: [webwatch] Announcement: The WYFIWYG Web Site]
Wednesday, 4 August 1999
Tuesday, 3 August 1999
Wednesday, 4 August 1999
- Re: Review request
- Re: Review request
- Re: Review request
- Re: Review request
- Re: Review request
- Re: Review request
- Review request
- [Fwd: Comprehensive List of Web Browsers]
- Portuguese web accessibility legislation
Monday, 2 August 1999
Sunday, 1 August 1999
Saturday, 31 July 1999
Thursday, 29 July 1999
- Re: Petition for the Accessibility of the Portuguese Internet
- WAI IG Call For Review: USER AGENT ACCESSIBILITY GUIDELINES
- Re: ALDICT - Access of Persons with Learning Disabilities to Information and Communication Technologies
- ALDICT - Access of Persons with Learning Disabilities to Information and Communication Technologies
Wednesday, 28 July 1999
- UK Digital Economy Report
- Re: Two UK Accessibility Articles
- RE: Two UK Accessibility Articles
- RE: Two UK Accessibility Articles
Tuesday, 27 July 1999
- Re: Two UK Accessibility Articles
- CNN Chat Yesterday with Guido Corona
- Re: discouraging news from ToolBook and MIT
- Two UK Accessibility Articles
Monday, 26 July 1999
- Re: discouraging news from ToolBook and MIT
- RE: discouraging news from ToolBook and MIT
- discouraging news from ToolBook and MIT
- help!
Sunday, 25 July 1999
- Re: About Priority 2.1 and 2.2
- Re: About Priority 2.1 and 2.2
- Re: Lynx and log files
- Re[2]: Lynx and log files
- Re: Lynx and log files
- Re:(SDF proposal)
- Re: Lynx and log files
- Re: Lynx and log files
Saturday, 24 July 1999
- [Fwd: Fwd: Another Approach to Blind Web Access]
- Re: Lynx and log files
- Accessible web authoring is expensive and difficult ?
Thursday, 22 July 1999
Saturday, 24 July 1999
Friday, 23 July 1999
Saturday, 24 July 1999
Friday, 23 July 1999
- RE: Keyboard Command Wish List [was Can't see selection highlights]
- SYSTRANS On-the-Fly Translation Form [was Re: Braillesurf]
- RE: Keyboard Command Wish List [was Can't see selection highlights]
- Re: General Comment re Guidelines/Discussion
- Braillesurf [was Can't see selection highlights
- RE: General Comment re Guidelines/Discussion
- Re: General Comment re Guidelines/Discussion
- RE: General Comment re Guidelines/Discussion
- RE: URGENT: Help
- RE: URGENT: Help
- RE: General Comment re Guidelines/Discussion
- RE: URGENT: Help
- RE: URGENT: Help
- Keyboard Command Wish List [was Can't see selection highlights]
- Re: Can't see selection highlights
- Re: URGENT: Help
- Re: General Comment re Guidelines/Discussion
- Re: About Priority 2.1 and 2.2
- RE: Can't see selection highlights
- Re: URGENT: Help
Thursday, 22 July 1999
Friday, 23 July 1999
Thursday, 22 July 1999
- Re: About Priority 1.1
- Checkpoint 1.1
- Re: About Priority 1.1
- About Priority 2.1 and 2.2
- About Priority 1.1
- General Comment re Guidelines/Discussion
- RE: Can't see selection highlights
- RE: Can't see selection highlights
- RE: Can't see selection highlights
- RE: Can't see selection highlights
- Re: Can't see selection highlights
- Can't see selection highlights
- Re: Meta Tags
- Re: Bank Technology News International Article on Accessibility
- Bank Technology News International Article on Accessibility
- Meta Tags
Wednesday, 21 July 1999
- Re: Builder.Com Article on Accessibility
- Builder.Com Article on Accessibility
- RE: Fw: Checkpoint 3.3
- Closing 3.3 discussion on IG list, it continues on GL list
- Re: Guidelines vs Standards (was Checkpoint 3.3)
- RE: Fw: Checkpoint 3.3
- RE: Guidelines vs Standards (was Checkpoint 3.3)
- Re: Web Accessibility Education
- Re: Fw: Checkpoint 3.3
- CSS and e-commerce
- WAI/ADA in the U.S. Department of Energy
- Re: Guidelines vs Standards (was Checkpoint 3.3)
- RE: Guidelines vs Standards (was Checkpoint 3.3)
- Web Accessibility Education
- Re: Fw: Checkpoint 3.3
- RE: Guidelines vs Standards (was Checkpoint 3.3)
Tuesday, 20 July 1999
- RE: Guidelines vs Standards (was Checkpoint 3.3)
- RE: Guidelines vs Standards (was Checkpoint 3.3)
- Re: Creating web pages
- RE: Guidelines vs Standards (was Checkpoint 3.3)
- RE: Guidelines vs Standards (was Checkpoint 3.3)
- Re: Creating web pages
- search engines
- Re: Creating web pages
- R: Creating web pages
- Creating web pages
- Re: Fw: Checkpoint 3.3
- Mozilla and Longdesc: Feedback Wanted
Monday, 19 July 1999
- Re: Problem of Physical vs. Logical Order [was RE: How can we make Microsoft Publisher Accessible on the Web
- Re: Fw: Checkpoint 3.3
- Re: Problem of Physical vs. Logical Order [was RE: How can we make Microsoft Publisher Accessible on the Web
- Re: Fw: Checkpoint 3.3
- Re: Problem of Physical vs. Logical Order [was RE: How can we make Microsoft Publisher Accessible on the Web
- Problem of Physical vs. Logical Order [was RE: How can we make Microsoft Publisher Accessible on the Web
- Re: Fw: Checkpoint 3.3
- Guidelines vs Standards (was Checkpoint 3.3)
- Re: Fw: Checkpoint 3.3
Sunday, 18 July 1999
Saturday, 17 July 1999
- RE: Fw: Checkpoint 3.3
- RE: Fw: Checkpoint 3.3
- RE: Fw: Checkpoint 3.3
- Re: Fw: Checkpoint 3.3
- Re: Fw: Checkpoint 3.3
- Re: Fw: Checkpoint 3.3
- Re: Fw: Checkpoint 3.3
Friday, 16 July 1999
- Re: Fw: Checkpoint 3.3
- Re: FW: press Release - Able Channel . . .
- Re: Fw: Checkpoint 3.3
- Re: Fw: Checkpoint 3.3
- Re: Fw: Checkpoint 3.3
Thursday, 15 July 1999
Wednesday, 14 July 1999
- Re: ASP is not accessible?
- ASP is not accessible?
- Re: What will they think of next! not the BOOK, but the SCROLL !!
- Re: [Fwd: ACCESSIBILITY VIDEO - The Royal National Institute for the Blind]
Tuesday, 13 July 1999
- What will they think of next!
- Lutris' server divides duties (http://www.zdnet.com/pcweek/stories/news/0,4153
- ACCESSIBILITY VIDEO - The Royal National Institute for the Blind
- Re: Color Blindness
Monday, 12 July 1999
- Re: Temporally re moved from mailing list????
- Temporally re moved from mailing list????
- RE: Color Blindness
- Re: Color Blindness
- Color Blindness
- Re: Radio transcripts
Saturday, 10 July 1999
- Re: Fw: 50 States Quarters
- IID NEWSLETTER - SPECIAL EDITION - July ' 99
- Rate your web site
- Re: Radio transcripts
- FW: Press Release: Petition crowned of success
- Off Topic: Accessibility consultant in Northern California
Friday, 9 July 1999
- Re: wall st. journal "brace of new federal requirements could help out disabled web users
- Radio transcripts
- Press Release: Petition crowned of success
- Re: Citation of URLs
- Re: Citation of URLs
- RE: wall st. journal "brace of new federal requirements could help out disabled web users
- Reminder about registering for the Sophia WAI meetings
- Re: Fw: 50 States Quarters
- Re: MARKUP LANGUAGES: THEORY AND PRACTICE is a new peer-reviewed technical journal of text markup for computer processing
- RE: Citation of URLs
- Re: Citation of URLs
- Citation of URLs
- MARKUP LANGUAGES: THEORY AND PRACTICE is a new peer-reviewed technical journal of text markup for computer processing
- To the listserv administrator
- Re: Radio transcripts -CNN
- Radio transcripts
- Fw: 50 States Quarters
- Re: wall st. journal "brace of new federal requirements could help out disabled web users
- Re: wall st. journal "brace of new federal requirements could help out disabled web users
- read please voicing text on the web and...
- Re: Netomat Browser
Thursday, 8 July 1999
- RE: FW: Accessibility of ATW
- RE: Netomat Browser
- Accessible Media
- Re: FW: Accessibility of ATW
- wall st. journal "brace of new federal requirements could help out disabled web users
- New Internet Directory! Try it! You'll Love it!!
- Re: Checkpoint 3.6: Big Hurdle for Double-AA/Triple-AAA Compliance
- Re: Re[2]: FW: Accessibility of ATW
- Re: Checkpoint 3.6: Big Hurdle for Double-AA/Triple-AAA Compliance
- Re: Re[2]: FW: Accessibility of ATW
Wednesday, 7 July 1999
- Re[2]: FW: Accessibility of ATW
- Re:Netomat Browser
- Re: FW: Accessibility of ATW
- Re: towards a vocabulary and grammar of abstract graphic
- Web Mobility
Tuesday, 6 July 1999
- towards a vocabulary and grammar of abstract graphic
- Re: FW: Accessibility of ATW
- Re: Checkpoint 3.6: Big Hurdle for Double-AA/Triple-AAA Compliance
- Discharging my promise to reveal:
- FW: Accessibility of ATW
Monday, 5 July 1999
- Re: Checkpoint 3.6: Big Hurdle for Double-AA/Triple-AAA Compliance
- Re: Checkpoint 3.6: Big Hurdle for Double-AA/Triple-AAA Compliance
- Checkpoint 3.6: Big Hurdle for Double-AA/Triple-AAA Compliance
- Re: AAA WCAG Conformance
Sunday, 4 July 1999
Saturday, 3 July 1999
- Re: NewsWatch: TechWeb article (WAI, jbrewer, Jakob Nielsen)
- Re: Petition for the Accessibility of the Portuguese Internet
Friday, 2 July 1999
- Netomat URL
- Netomat Browser
- NewsWatch: TechWeb article (WAI, jbrewer, Jakob Nielsen)
- [Fwd: NEW: html]
- Need advice on disseminating force feedback technology