- From: Jason White <jasonw@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au>
- Date: Thu, 8 Jul 1999 11:37:50 +1000 (AEST)
- To: WAI Interest Group <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
It is easy to read absurdities into the guidelines by considering individual checkpoints in abstraction from their context in the document as a whole. However, this is not an appropriate strategy of interpretation. I do not wish to imply that anyone has been misinterpreting the text deliberately. Rather, I would suggest that the tendency to concentrate on each checkpoint in isolation, for the purpose of judging compliance, naturally leads to the overlooking of important contextual details. Thus, if checkpoint 5.4 is read together with checkpoint 5.3, then it is clear that the uses of structural markup to create visual effects, against which 5.4 is directed, do not include the employment of tables for layout purposes as such, but comprise only the making of certain markup distinctions (such as between TH and TD elements) which imply structure, in cases where the author's intention is to force certain visual effects. The example in checkpoint 5.4 makes this clear. Similarly, checkpoints 5.3 and 3.3 can be read consistently with each other. Indeed, the note accompanying checkpoint 5.3 makes it clear that the use of tables for layout is a short-term exception to the requirement specified in checkpoint 3.3 that style sheets be used to control layout and presentation. No doubt, one could attempt to rewrite the guidelines so as to make all of the interrelationships among checkpoints explicit. The question to be considered, however, is whether the added complexity which would thus be introduced, is warranted, and whether there are significant and genuine ambiguities that need to be addressed. The role of the "techniques document" in clarifying the guidelines is also relevant, in that it provides more detailed discussion of the requirements which are succinctly expressed in the latter text. Please note that all opinions expressed in this message are mine alone and do not purport to reflect any discussion or consensus which may or may not have emerged in the Web Content Guidelines working group.
Received on Wednesday, 7 July 1999 21:37:56 UTC