- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 17:55:54 -0400 (EDT)
- To: ADAM GUASCH-MELENDEZ <ADAM.GUASCH@EEOC.GOV>
- cc: w3c-wai-au@w3.org, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Adam, thanks for these. I have excluded plain-text editors such as vi, and general purpose tools such as sed. I have drawn a slightly arbitrary line - since emacs has both an html mode with hotkeys for including various html commands, and a browsing mode (w3 - very popular amongst blind users, for example) for review, should it be included? Do you have URIs for the asWedit and CoffeeCup? Cheers Charles On Mon, 23 Aug 1999, ADAM GUASCH-MELENDEZ wrote: Those of us using some variant of Unix have a very different toolset, usually based on general-purpose text editors and scripting languages. vi, emacs, perl, sed, etc. Looking at specialized, not general-purpose, tools, I use Webmaker (part of the KDE environment) for HTML, and weblint and tidy to catch my mistakes. Gimp for image editing and cvs for version control round it out nicely. A couple of other Unix HTML options: asWedit CoffeeCup Adam Guasch-Melendez EEOC >>> Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org> 08/23 2:54 PM >>> This is a long way from comprehensive, and only tries to cover tools which are currently developed, so notables like AOLpress weren't listed. I would be interested in a better list too, so if anyone wnats to add their favourite (or leaast favourite, or any othe kind of) tool, I'll try to collate them. --Charles McCathieNevile mailto:charles@w3.org phone: +1 617 258 0992 http://www.w3.org/People/Charles W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI MIT/LCS - 545 Technology sq., Cambridge MA, 02139, USA
Received on Monday, 23 August 1999 17:55:56 UTC