- From: Wayne Crotts <wcrotts@arches.uga.edu>
- Date: Fri, 23 Jul 1999 14:42:39 -0400
- To: "WAI Interest Group" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
So we have the same problem of old browsers not being able to read it. Folks, considering that my department is full of old PC486 machines, I can't just pretend this is not an issue. Wayne ----- Original Message ----- From: Night, Joe <Joe.Night@gateway.com> To: WAI Interest Group <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org> Sent: Friday, July 23, 1999 2:47 PM Subject: RE: General Comment re Guidelines/Discussion If you choose to use both at the same time, you create an additional usability risk. Assume for a moment that your choice in font size and face presents a readability issue. For example, lets say it's Times Roman and it's set to -3. It is hardly reasonable to expect an average reader to use the browser agent's font size/face changing ability to fix your screwup. I would suggest that expecting an average reader to change the fonts and then turn off a style would be sadistical. That would be way beyond the ability or desire of the average surfer. -----Original Message----- From: Wayne Crotts [SMTP:wcrotts@arches.uga.edu] Sent: Friday, July 23, 1999 11:17 AM To: WAI Interest Group Subject: Re: General Comment re Guidelines/Discussion Are you asking that the author use both strategies (attributes and style sheet). Otherwise, don't we return to the problem that older browsers can't handle CSS. Wayne Wayne Crotts Network & Information Services Institute on Human Development and Disability A University Affiliated Program College of Family & Consumer Sciences University of Georgia 30602 (706) 542-4968 (706) 542-4815 (fax) ----- Original Message ----- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org> To: <webmaster@dors.sailorsite.net> Cc: 'Charles F. Munat' <charles@munat.com>; WAI Interest Group <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org> Sent: Friday, July 23, 1999 1:59 PM Subject: RE: General Comment re Guidelines/Discussion This thread is moved to the guidelines list, where itis under discussion. owever I don't think you have to give up those attributes, you just have to use a style sheet as well. Charles McCN On Fri, 23 Jul 1999, Bruce Bailey wrote: I don't have a problem with avoiding wholly deprecated elements. Unfortunately, by my reading, 3.3 is stricter than this. To follow this checkpoint I would also have to give up all occurrences of ALIGN=CENTER/RIGHT attributes. That is too much of a sacrifice for me! On Wednesday, July 21, 1999 10:39 PM, Charles F. Munat [SMTP:charles@munat.com] wrote: > As for Priority 3.3, I read it to say that you should use a stylesheet for > layout vs. elements such as B, I, FONT, etc. As far as I'm concerned, as > long as you avoid those elements, you've met this priority. If you want to > make text red, use a stylesheet or the style attribute rather than the font > tag. If you can live without the B, I, etc. tags, and you don't feel that > you need a stylesheet, I don't see that Priority 3.3 requires one. What, a > blank one, just for looks? --Charles McCathieNevile mailto:charles@w3.org phone: +1 617 258 0992 http://www.w3.org/People/Charles W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI MIT/LCS - 545 Technology sq., Cambridge MA, 02139, USA
Received on Friday, 23 July 1999 14:49:38 UTC