public-vocabs@w3.org from September 2013 by date

Monday, 30 September 2013

• Re: [a11y-metadata-project] meeting Monday? NO Charles McCathie Nevile
• Re: Proposal: Audiobook Karen Coyle
• Re: [a11y-metadata-project] schema.org test Liddy Nevile
• Re: Proposal: Audiobook Dan Brickley
• Re: Proposal: Audiobook Karen Coyle
• Re: Proposal: Audiobook Dan Brickley
• Re: Proposal: Audiobook Wallis,Richard
• Re: [a11y-metadata-project] meeting Monday? NO Gerardo Capiel
• Re: Proposal: Audiobook Guha
• Re: Proposal: Audiobook Karen Coyle
• Re: Proposal: Audiobook Guha
• Re: Proposal: Audiobook Karen Coyle
• Re: [a11y-metadata-project] meeting Monday? NO Dan Brickley
• Re: [a11y-metadata-project] meeting Monday? NO Liddy Nevile
• Re: [a11y-metadata-project] meeting Monday? NO Charles Myers
• Re: [a11y-metadata-project] meeting Monday? Liddy Nevile

Sunday, 29 September 2013

• Re: Multiple identical schemas Justin Boyan
• Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Re: clearing the logic... Liddy Nevile
• French translation Lucien Dubois

Friday, 27 September 2013

• Multiple identical schemas Jens Tobiska

Saturday, 28 September 2013

• Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Re: clearing the logic... Madeleine Rothberg
• Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Re: clearing the logic... Charles McCathie Nevile

Friday, 27 September 2013

• Re: Proposal: Audiobook Tom Morris
• Re: Proposal: Audiobook Justin Boyan
• Re: Proposal: Audiobook Thad Guidry
• Re: Proposal: Audiobook Karen Coyle
• Re: Proposal: Audiobook Phil Barker
• Re: Proposal: Audiobook Dan Brickley
• Re: Proposal: Audiobook Thad Guidry
• Re: Proposal: Audiobook Dan Brickley
• Re: Proposal: Audiobook Thad Guidry
• Re: Proposal: Audiobook Dan Brickley
• Re: Proposal: Audiobook Thad Guidry
• Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Re: clearing the logic... Liddy Nevile
• Re: Proposal: Audiobook Phil Barker

Thursday, 26 September 2013

• Re: Proposal: Audiobook Karen Coyle
• Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Re: clearing the logic... Liddy Nevile
• Re: Proposal: Audiobook Vicki Tardif Holland
• Re: Proposal: Audiobook Martin Hepp
• Re: Proposal: Audiobook Wallis,Richard
• Re: Proposal: Audiobook Martin Hepp
• Re: Error Incomplete microdata with schema.org Martin Hepp
• Re: Setting up a conference call on accessibility metadata, especially accessMode/mediaFeature for Thursday, 9/26 Gerardo Capiel

Wednesday, 25 September 2013

• Re: Error Incomplete microdata with schema.org Willem-Siebe Spoelstra
• Re: Setting up a conference call on accessibility metadata, especially accessMode/mediaFeature for Thursday, 9/26 Charles McCathie Nevile
• Setting up a conference call on accessibility metadata, especially accessMode/mediaFeature for Thursday, 9/26 Charles Myers
• Re: Proposal: Audiobook Guha
• Re: Proposal: Audiobook Karen Coyle
• Re: Proposal: Audiobook Thad Guidry
• Re: Proposal: Audiobook Guha
• Re: Proposal: Audiobook Karen Coyle
• Re: Proposal: Audiobook Martin Hepp

Tuesday, 24 September 2013

• Re: Proposal: Audiobook Karen Coyle
• Re: Proposal: Audiobook Martin Hepp
• Re: Proposal: Audiobook Martin Hepp
• Re: Proposal: Audiobook Dan Scott
• [a11y-metadata-project] Video of Access for All demo Madeleine Rothberg

Monday, 23 September 2013

• Re: Proposal: Audiobook Karen Coyle
• Re: Proposal: Audiobook Martin Hepp
• A request to set up some times for group conference calls to resolve the mediafeature/ accessmode issues for Accessibility Metadata Charles Myers
• Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion Lin Clark
• Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion Martin Hepp
• RE: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion Evain, Jean-Pierre
• Property pages are missing property name in title Stéphane Corlosquet
• Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion jean delahousse

Sunday, 22 September 2013

• Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion Holger Knublauch
• Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion Dan Brickley
• Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion Stéphane Corlosquet
• SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion Stéphane Corlosquet

Saturday, 21 September 2013

• Re: CreativeWork relationships Karen Coyle
• Re: Proposal: Audiobook Niklas Lindström

Friday, 20 September 2013

• Re: CreativeWork relationships Niklas Lindström
• Re: CreativeWork relationships Niklas Lindström
• Re: CreativeWork relationships Niklas Lindström
• Re: CreativeWork relationships Dan Brickley
• Re: CreativeWork relationships Thad Guidry
• Re: CreativeWork relationships Phil Barker
• Re: CreativeWork relationships Vicki Tardif Holland
• Re: CreativeWork relationships Karen Coyle
• Re: Proposal: Audiobook Dan Scott
• Re: CreativeWork relationships Vicki Tardif Holland
• Re: Proposal: Audiobook Wallis,Richard
• CreativeWork relationships Wallis,Richard

Thursday, 19 September 2013

• Re: Proposal: Audiobook Karen Coyle
• Re: Proposal: Audiobook Owen Stephens
• Re: Proposal: Audiobook Aaron Bradley
• Re: Proposal: Audiobook Vicki Tardif Holland
• Re: Proposal: Audiobook Thad Guidry
• Re: Proposal: Audiobook Karen Coyle
• Re: Proposal: Audiobook Karen Coyle
• Re: Proposal: Audiobook Karen Coyle
• Re: Proposal: Audiobook Thad Guidry
• Re: Proposal: Audiobook Thad Guidry
• Re: Proposal: Audiobook Aaron Bradley
• Re: Proposal: Audiobook Niklas Lindström
• Re: Proposal: Audiobook Thad Guidry
• Re: Proposal: Audiobook Thad Guidry
• Re: Proposal: Audiobook Aaron Bradley
• Proposal: Audiobook Wallis,Richard
• Re: Semantically marking up a "checklist" or process Tallyfy

Tuesday, 17 September 2013

• Re: We want accessMode and mediaFeature functions Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Schema.org accessibility proposal Review... Gerardo Capiel

Monday, 16 September 2013

• Re: Best schema to use for services David Deering
• Re: Best schema to use for services Vicki Tardif Holland

Friday, 13 September 2013

• Re: Best schema to use for services Jarno van Driel
• Re: Best schema to use for services Martin Hepp
• Re: Best schema to use for services Jarno van Driel
• Re: Best schema to use for services Martin Hepp
• Re: Best schema to use for services Martin Hepp
• Re: Best schema to use for services Martin Hepp
• Re: Best schema to use for services Jarno van Driel
• Re: Best schema to use for services David Deering
• Re: Best schema to use for services Jarno van Driel

Wednesday, 11 September 2013

• Re: Civic Services Schema - Andrew Clark John Novatnack

Friday, 13 September 2013

• Re: Best schema to use for services David Deering
• Re: Civic Services Schema - Andrew Clark Phil Archer
• Re: Best schema to use for services Martin Hepp
• Re: Proposal: make http://schema.org/Offer more friendly for non-commercial usage Martin Hepp
• Re: Semantically marking up a "checklist" or process Martin Hepp
• Re: Semantically marking up a "checklist" or process Phil Barker

Thursday, 12 September 2013

• Re: Best schema to use for services Jarno van Driel
• Re: Best schema to use for services David Deering
• Re: Semantically marking up a "checklist" or process TallyFy
• Re: Proposal: make http://schema.org/Offer more friendly for non-commercial usage Karen Coyle
• Re: Proposal: make http://schema.org/Offer more friendly for non-commercial usage Dan Scott
• Re: Proposal: make http://schema.org/Offer more friendly for non-commercial usage Thad Guidry
• Re: Proposal: make http://schema.org/Offer more friendly for non-commercial usage Renato Iannella
• Re: Proposal: make http://schema.org/Offer more friendly for non-commercial usage Dan Scott
• Re: Proposal: make http://schema.org/Offer more friendly for non-commercial usage Dan Scott

Wednesday, 11 September 2013

• Re: Proposal: make http://schema.org/Offer more friendly for non-commercial usage Martin Hepp
• Re: Proposal: make http://schema.org/Offer more friendly for non-commercial usage Thad Guidry
• We want accessMode and mediaFeature functions Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Schema.org accessibility proposal Review... Charles McCathie Nevile
• Re: Proposal: make http://schema.org/Offer more friendly for non-commercial usage Dan Scott
• Re: Best schema to use for services Thad Guidry
• Re: Semantically marking up a "checklist" or process Jason Douglas
• Re: Semantically marking up a "checklist" or process Justin Boyan
• Re: Semantically marking up a "checklist" or process Vicki Tardif Holland
• Re: Best schema to use for services Jarno van Driel
• Re: Best schema to use for services Dan Scott
• Re: Semantically marking up a "checklist" or process Martin Hepp
• Re: Semantically marking up a "checklist" or process Justin Boyan
• Re: Semantically marking up a "checklist" or process Martin Hepp
• Re: Semantically marking up a "checklist" or process Jason Douglas
• Re: Semantically marking up a "checklist" or process Martin Hepp
• Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Schema.org accessibility proposal Review... Gerardo Capiel
• Re: Semantically marking up a "checklist" or process Jason Douglas
• Re: Best schema to use for services Jarno van Driel

Tuesday, 10 September 2013

• Best schema to use for services David Deering

Wednesday, 11 September 2013

• Re: Semantically marking up a "checklist" or process Martin Hepp
• Re: Semantically marking up a "checklist" or process Martin Hepp
• Re: Semantically marking up a "checklist" or process Martin Hepp
• Re: Semantically marking up a "checklist" or process Martin Hepp

Tuesday, 10 September 2013

• Re: Semantically marking up a "checklist" or process Jason Douglas
• Re: Semantically marking up a "checklist" or process Jason Douglas
• Re: Semantically marking up a "checklist" or process Aaron Bradley
• Re: Semantically marking up a "checklist" or process Karen Coyle
• Re: Semantically marking up a "checklist" or process Jarno van Driel
• Re: Semantically marking up a "checklist" or process Jason Douglas
• Re: Semantically marking up a "checklist" or process Jarno van Driel
• Re: Semantically marking up a "checklist" or process Jarno van Driel
• Re: Semantically marking up a "checklist" or process Martin Hepp
• Re: Semantically marking up a "checklist" or process Jarno van Driel
• Re: Semantically marking up a "checklist" or process Martin Hepp
• Re: Semantically marking up a "checklist" or process Jarno van Driel
• Re: Semantically marking up a "checklist" or process Martin Hepp
• Re: Semantically marking up a "checklist" or process Martin Hepp
• Re: Semantically marking up a "checklist" or process Jarno van Driel
• Re: Semantically marking up a "checklist" or process Martin Hepp
• Re: Semantically marking up a "checklist" or process Jarno van Driel
• Re: Semantically marking up a "checklist" or process Martin Hepp
• Re: Semantically marking up a "checklist" or process Justin Boyan
• Re: Semantically marking up a "checklist" or process Guha
• Re: Proposal: make http://schema.org/Offer more friendly for non-commercial usage Martin Hepp
• Proposal: make http://schema.org/Offer more friendly for non-commercial usage Dan Scott
• Re: Semantically marking up a "checklist" or process Martin Hepp
• Re: Semantically marking up a "checklist" or process Martin Hepp
• Re: Semantically marking up a "checklist" or process Jarno van Driel
• Re: Semantically marking up a "checklist" or process Jarno van Driel
• Re: Semantically marking up a "checklist" or process Justin Boyan
• Re: Semantically marking up a "checklist" or process Martin Hepp
• Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Schema.org accessibility proposal Review... Liddy Nevile

Monday, 9 September 2013

• Re: Help needed: EPUB 3.01 revision referencing a11y metadata spec Dan Brickley
• Re: Semantically marking up a "checklist" or process TallyFy
• Re: Semantically marking up a "checklist" or process Martin Hepp
• Re: Semantically marking up a "checklist" or process Jason Douglas
• Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Schema.org accessibility proposal Review... Richard Schwerdtfeger
• Re: Semantically marking up a "checklist" or process Martin Hepp
• Re: Help needed: EPUB 3.01 revision referencing a11y metadata spec Martin Hepp
• Re: Semantically marking up a "checklist" or process Tallyfy
• Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Schema.org accessibility proposal Review... Charles Myers
• Re: Semantically marking up a "checklist" or process Martin Hepp

Friday, 6 September 2013

• Re: Semantically marking up a "checklist" or process Vicki Tardif Holland
• RE: Schema.org accessibility proposal Review... Ian Niles

Monday, 9 September 2013

• Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Re: Schema.org accessibility proposal Review... Liddy Nevile
• Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Schema.org accessibility proposal Review... Charles Myers
• Re: Schema.org accessibility proposal Review... Liddy Nevile

Sunday, 8 September 2013

• Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Re: Schema.org accessibility proposal Review... Gerardo Capiel
• Re: Help needed: EPUB 3.01 revision referencing a11y metadata spec Gerardo Capiel
• Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Re: Schema.org accessibility proposal Review... Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo
• Re: Help needed: EPUB 3.01 revision referencing a11y metadata spec Dan Scott
• Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Re: Schema.org accessibility proposal Review... Dan Scott
• Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Schema.org accessibility proposal Review... Wallis,Richard
• Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Re: Schema.org accessibility proposal Review... Charles Myers
• Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Re: Schema.org accessibility proposal Review... Andy Heath
• Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Re: Schema.org accessibility proposal Review... Madeleine Rothberg
• Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Re: Schema.org accessibility proposal Review... Gerardo Capiel
• Re: Schema.org accessibility proposal Review... Madeleine Rothberg
• Re: Schema.org accessibility proposal Review... Liddy Nevile
• Re: Schema.org accessibility proposal Review... Karen Coyle
• Re: Schema.org accessibility proposal Review... Liddy Nevile
• Re: Schema.org accessibility proposal Review... Karen Coyle
• Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Re: Schema.org accessibility proposal Review... Andy Heath
• Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Re: Schema.org accessibility proposal Review... Liddy Nevile
• Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Re: Schema.org accessibility proposal Review... Charles McCathie Nevile
• Re: Schema.org accessibility proposal Review... Liddy Nevile

Saturday, 7 September 2013

• Re: Help needed: EPUB 3.01 revision referencing a11y metadata spec Karen Coyle
• Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Re: Schema.org accessibility proposal Review... Andy Heath
• Re: Schema.org accessibility proposal Review... Charles McCathie Nevile
• Re: Schema.org accessibility proposal Review... Charles McCathie Nevile

Friday, 6 September 2013

• RE: Schema.org accessibility proposal Review... Richard Schwerdtfeger
• Re: Semantically marking up a "checklist" or process Sam Goto
• RE: [a11y-metadata-project] Re: Schema.org accessibility proposal Review... Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo
• RE: [a11y-metadata-project] RE: Schema.org accessibility proposal Review... Charles Myers
• Re: [a11y-metadata-project] RE: Schema.org accessibility proposal Review... Madeleine Rothberg
• Civic Services Schema - Andrew Clark Andrew Clark
• RE: Schema.org accessibility proposal Review... Charles Myers

Thursday, 5 September 2013

• RE: Schema.org accessibility proposal Review... Charles Myers
• RE: Schema.org accessibility proposal Review... Charles Myers

Friday, 6 September 2013

• RE: Schema.org accessibility proposal Review... Richard Schwerdtfeger
• Re: Help needed: EPUB 3.01 revision referencing a11y metadata spec Dan Scott
• RE: Schema.org accessibility proposal Review... Richard Schwerdtfeger
• Re: Schema.org accessibility proposal Review... Karen Coyle
• Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Re: Schema.org accessibility proposal Review... Andy Heath
• Re: Semantically marking up a "checklist" or process Tallyfy
• Re: Schema.org accessibility proposal Review... Charles McCathie Nevile

Thursday, 5 September 2013

• Re: Schema.org accessibility proposal Review... Richard Schwerdtfeger
• Re: Schema.org accessibility proposal Review... Gerardo Capiel
• Re: Implementing schema.org at a major academic publisher Laura Dawson
• Implementing schema.org at a major academic publisher Paul Watson
• Re: Semantically marking up a "checklist" or process Sam Goto
• Re: Semantically marking up a "checklist" or process Tallyfy
• ISO support for A11y Metadata proposal Treviranus, Jutta (Academic)
• Re: Semantically marking up a "checklist" or process Jason Douglas

Wednesday, 4 September 2013

• accessibility properties for schema.org Jim Goodell

Thursday, 5 September 2013

• Semantically marking up a "checklist" or process Tallyfy
• Re: Error Incomplete microdata with schema.org Willem-Siebe Spoelstra

Wednesday, 4 September 2013

• Re: Proposal: Looking inside tables Omar Benjelloun
• Re: Error Incomplete microdata with schema.org Thad Guidry
• Re: Error Incomplete microdata with schema.org Martin Hepp
• Re: Error Incomplete microdata with schema.org Martin Hepp
• Re: Error Incomplete microdata with schema.org Willem-Siebe Spoelstra
• Re: Review: ReviewBody or description? Thad Guidry
• Re: Error Incomplete microdata with schema.org Thad Guidry
• Re: Author markup question Dave Pawson
• Review: ReviewBody or description? Willem-Siebe Spoelstra
• Re: Author markup question Willem-Siebe Spoelstra
• Re: Author markup question Dan Brickley
• Author markup question Willem-Siebe Spoelstra
• Re: Error Incomplete microdata with schema.org Willem-Siebe Spoelstra

Tuesday, 3 September 2013

• Re: schema.org typo: "antagonym" Sam Goto
• Re: schema.org typo: "antagonym" Sam Goto

Monday, 2 September 2013

• Re: Proposal: Looking inside tables Guha

Last message date: Monday, 30 September 2013 22:22:01 UTC