- From: Liddy Nevile <liddy@sunriseresearch.org>
- Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 19:37:06 +1000
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
- Cc: Charles Myers <charlesm@benetech.org>, Charles McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru>, Gerardo Capiel <gerardoc@benetech.org>, Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>, "a11y-metadata-project@googlegroups.com" <a11y-metadata-project@googlegroups.com>, Alexander Shubin <ajax@yandex-team.ru>, Andy Heath <andyheath@axelrod.plus.com>, Dan Scott <dan@coffeecode.net>, Egor Antonov <elderos@yandex-team.ru>, Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo <emmanuelle@sidar.org>, Jason Johnson <jasjoh@microsoft.com>, George Kerscher <kerscher@montana.com>, Madeleine Rothberg <madeleine_rothberg@wgbh.org>, Matt Garrish <matt.garrish@bell.net>, "public-vocabs@w3.org" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
Dan I think we are in agreement that there will be accessHazard - which will say that there is not a hazard hiding in the resource (Charles' advice is to do it this way) then there will be accessMode and that will be a combination of the modes that will provide a complete version of the content - eg visual + text for a video file with captions etc - even if it also has audio... and visual + audio - for the video with its usual audio and maybe text if it is possible to get all the content from text - visual and audio replacements then there will be accessFeatures eg transformableText so that all text is in a format that can be rendered as Braille.... etc..... I think that the breakdown of what are the full set of values for these three ar not yet finally decided. I hope that helps... --- and pls read my other email or talk to Charles about December :-) Liddy On 30/09/2013, at 6:35 PM, Dan Brickley wrote: > Ok, keep us posted! Sorry I couldn't make thursday's call. > > This week I'm making test builds of the schema.org site with some > work-in-progress vocabulary. For example > http://sdo-actions.appspot.com/ActionHandler does this for Actions > work-in-progress. I'd like to do the same for Accessibility drafts. Is > there someone who can work with me on this? The necessary config file > format is more or less RDFa+RDFS in HTML, see > https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webschema/file/c70ba13bab40/schema.org/ext/sameas.html > ... can we start with the most consensual areas and work out > incrementally from there, perhaps? > > Dan > > > > On 30 September 2013 07:02, Liddy Nevile <liddy@sunriseresearch.org> > wrote: >> suits me! >> >> thanks >> >> Liddy >> >> On 30/09/2013, at 12:28 PM, Charles Myers wrote: >> >>> On 9/29/2013 6:46 PM, Liddy Nevile wrote: >>>> >>>> is there a Monday 30th Sept call, pls??? >>>> >>>> >>> Thanks for the ping, Liddy. >>> >>> I think our call on Thursday was great, and I'm still writing. >>> Charles is >>> unavailable on Monday. I don't think it makes sense to have >>> another call >>> until a concrete set of ideas are out there (last Thursday's >>> productive call >>> is still a lot to absorb into a full set of use cases). >>> >>> >> >
Received on Monday, 30 September 2013 21:19:54 UTC