Looking ... On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 12:34 PM, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org> wrote: > +Cc: Ian, Sam who worked on this, > > On 29 August 2013 19:43, Dan Scott <dan@coffeecode.net> wrote: > >> Hello: >> >> In reviewing some of the new Action types, I noticed the use of the word >> "antagonym" popped up frequently to describe the relationship to another >> action that causes the reverse result. >> >> For example: >> >> http://schema.org/AcceptAction says the related action RejectAction is >> "The >> antagonym of AcceptAction." >> >> However, an antagonym is a single word that has meanings that contradict >> each other. The only case where I think this might possibly be valid is >> for >> CancelAction... >> >> I believe "antonym" was likely the intended term, but would recommend >> that the plainer English "opposite" be used instead, as plain English >> is generally preferable for technical documentation. >> > > Thanks - my guess is you're right and antonym was intended. I've filed > this here, https://www.w3.org/2011/webschema/track/issues/24 ... > investigating... > > Dan >
Received on Tuesday, 3 September 2013 18:34:37 UTC