- From: Vicki Tardif Holland <vtardif@google.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 14:49:51 -0400
- To: kcoyle@kcoyle.net
- Cc: "public-vocabs@w3.org" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 19 September 2013 18:50:22 UTC
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 2:27 PM, Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net> wrote: > I can understand the desire to connect the audiobook and the print book > which is being read. In most catalogs and databases they "connect" > because they have the same author, title and subjects, so they are > retrieved with the same query and may be merged in display (cf. Amazon > displays). I'm not sure that the data that exists will lend itself to > providing the information to support isBasedOnUrl. This becomes a > question of goals, therefore: to provide schema.org properties for > current data, or to make schema.org into a schema that allows new > metadata to be created. I admit that at the moment I'm more interested > in the former, since I see a first use case for schema to mark up > existing data. I'm not seeing it as a metadata creation schema. Perhaps > others are aiming at the latter? > To this point, it would be nice to be able to associate a CreativeWork adapted from another CreativeWork, whether it is an audio book as an adaptation of the text, a movie based on a book, or even a graphic novel based on an original work. Vicki Vicki Tardif Holland | Ontologist | vtardif@google.com
Received on Thursday, 19 September 2013 18:50:22 UTC