- From: Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 09:59:19 -0500
- To: "Wallis,Richard" <Richard.Wallis@oclc.org>
- Cc: "public-vocabs@w3.org" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAChbWaP7CZBiQk7pyG7-_-bLSthanL1fN9NVzMpXoMDfvwW1oQ@mail.gmail.com>
I would like to counter suggest that we add to the Schema an "AudioRecording" type, instead. but.... I just noticed.... The idea of an "AudioBook" is also a MediaObject already by its very nature. It "encodesCreativeWork" (an existing property on MediaObject) already... its an encoding of a book in some form. Aaron's idea of a "recording" is the same thing as the generic idea of "encoding" in some form. CreativeWork is a Book and also an AudioBook. On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 6:30 AM, Wallis,Richard <Richard.Wallis@oclc.org>wrote: > This is a proposal from the Schema Bib Extend Group<http://www.w3.org/community/schemabibex/>, > consisting of 80+ people from a broad cross section of publishers, > libraries, and others interested in enhancing Schema.org's capabilities > in the area of bibliographic and associated resources. > > Proposal: > To create a new Type: 'Audiobook' > > An audiobook is sufficiently different to other book types to warrant > the proposal for another type. > > The proposal is that Audiobook is a sub-type of *both* Book<http://schema.org/Book> > and AudioObject <http://schema.org/AudioObject>. I am not sure if I > have seen a Type in Schema that has more than one super-type before, so I > am wondering if this is a valid approach. > > Detailed proposal posted on the WebSchemas wiki: Audiobook<http://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/Audiobook> > > > Richard Wallis > Technology Evangelist, OCLC > richard.wallis@oclc.org > > > > -- -Thad Thad on Freebase.com <http://www.freebase.com/view/en/thad_guidry> Thad on LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/thadguidry/>
Received on Thursday, 19 September 2013 14:59:54 UTC