- From: Guha <guha@google.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 06:50:37 -0700
- To: Martin Hepp <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>
- Cc: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>, "public-vocabs@w3.org" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAPAGhv-r9-VZngBMGiDvUVttkOz3rdYsGJyXcJbsvfoK+J0Kiw@mail.gmail.com>
Clearly, the syntax needs to support multiple types for an object. We already do that ... not sure I see the issue. Sorry for being slow ... guha On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 12:40 AM, Martin Hepp < martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org> wrote: > Hi Karen, > good that we have consensus. > > Dan, Guha: I think the issue of whether multi-type entities should be > solved > > a) at markup time or > b) in the vocabulary > > is of generic relevance - do you have an opinion on that? > > I think that for types that are not disjoint but also only loosely related > (like an AudioBook used as a Product), it is much cleaner and flexible to > recommend using both types at markup time. > > This also decouples the evolution of such needs / use cases from the > evolution of the schema.org spec - site owners do not have to wait for an > update to schema.org, and search engines can learn from the appearance of > new patterns. > > Martin > > On Sep 24, 2013, at 9:07 PM, Karen Coyle wrote: > > > > > > > On 9/24/13 11:40 AM, Martin Hepp wrote: > >> Hi Karen, > >> as already posted earlier today: > > > >> > >> Simply use the offers property from Product or the itemOffered property > from offer and make the AudioBook (or other object) of type AudioBook AND > Product. > > > > Yes, thanks, Martin. I saw that on your reply to Dan and that seems to > be exactly what we need. > > > > kc > > > > -- > > Karen Coyle > > kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net > > m: 1-510-435-8234 > > skype: kcoylenet > > > > -------------------------------------------------------- > martin hepp > e-business & web science research group > universitaet der bundeswehr muenchen > > e-mail: hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org > phone: +49-(0)89-6004-4217 > fax: +49-(0)89-6004-4620 > www: http://www.unibw.de/ebusiness/ (group) > http://www.heppnetz.de/ (personal) > skype: mfhepp > twitter: mfhepp > > Check out GoodRelations for E-Commerce on the Web of Linked Data! > ================================================================= > * Project Main Page: http://purl.org/goodrelations/ > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 25 September 2013 13:51:04 UTC