- From: Willem-Siebe Spoelstra <wsspoelstra@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2013 11:17:58 +0200
- To: Alexander Shubin <ajax@yandex-team.ru>
- Cc: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, "public-vocabs@w3.org" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAPGOeDscDN-5RqNbN1Ozk=fWyqwposUBbbKcUjOMunwxV=cLew@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Alex (and others), I'm almost there to implent the schema.org on my website. However, I do have some question left about the correct schema.org markup (so not Google specific). I have a page about a keratin treatment, I can use Product markup for this, because I read: Commodity services, like haircuts, can also be represented using this type. This page contains: - product name (keratin treatment) - the 'from' price or the pricerange (with a link to seperate price page) - aggregate userreview count - single reviews First, if I choose to show the pricerange, Alex his advice was to use the AggregateOffer, however looking at the explenation at schema.org, this looks only appropriate for comparison-websites: When a single product that has different offers (for example, the same pair > of shoes is offered by different merchants), then AggregateOffer can be > used. Am I right or wrong in this statement? Instead of showing the pricerange, I was thinking that showing a 'from' price maybe would be more appropriate. Is there a possibility for this? *EDIT EDIT: Only using lowPrice with AggregateOffer is giving the 'from' price, however the question still remains if AggregateOffer is appropriate.* I'm also working on a e-commerce website, where I also have on product that can be ordered in many colors and sizes. When I look at the integrated schema.org in that programm the show the 'from' price with a normal price property, is that correct? Kind regards, Willem 2013/8/12 Alexander Shubin <ajax@yandex-team.ru> > Hi, does anybody know why I get the error: Incomplete microdata with > schema.org > > > Try using http://schema.org/AggregateOffer instead > http://schema.org/pricespecification. Smth like this > > <div itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/Product"> > <span itemprop="name">Kenmore White 17″ Microwave</span><br /> > <img src="kenmore-microwave-17in.jpg" alt='Kenmore 17" Microwave' /></p> > <div itemprop="aggregateRating" itemscope itemtype=" > http://schema.org/AggregateRating"> > Rated <span itemprop="ratingValue">3.5</span>/5<br /> > based on <span itemprop="reviewCount">11</span> customer reviews > </div> > <div itemprop="offers" itemscope itemtype="* > http://schema.org/AggregateOffer*"> > <span itemprop="*lowPrice*">$55.00</span><br /> > <span itemprop="*highPrice*">$155.00</span> > </div> > > <p> Product description:<br /> > <span itemprop="description">0.7 cubic feet countertop microwave.<br /> > Has six preset cooking categories and convenience features like<br /> > Add-A-Minute and Child Lock.</span></p> > </div> > > > > This will give you > > Beware of another common mistake with float points for price and special > format for currency (for details, look > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/17314333/googles-testing-tool-thinks-product-markup-is-incomplete-why/17359160 > ). > > But Dan is right - this question is more suited for some Google specific > group. > ---- > Alex Shubin > Yandex.com <http://www.yandex.com> > > On Aug 12, 2013, at 8:42 PM, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org> wrote: > > On 12 August 2013 11:08, Willem-Siebe Spoelstra <wsspoelstra@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hi, does anybody know why I get the error: Incomplete microdata with > schema.org > > Rich snippet tool: > > http://www.google.nl/webmasters/tools/richsnippets?q=http%3A%2F%2Ftoolsetbootstrap.wpplayground.wpengine.com%2Fmin-and-max-price-not-working%2F > > > This is more a Google product question than something for this group, > but I'm afraid the answer is roughly: it's a known problem > (vague/unhelpful error messages), and the Structured Data Testing Tool > team are working on it. Perhaps > > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/17955572/rich-snippets-micro-data-for-products-error-incomplete-microdata-with-schema > might help too? > > Dan > > >
Attachments
- image/png attachment: 2013-08-12_2351.png
Received on Wednesday, 4 September 2013 09:19:34 UTC