Re: Proposal: Audiobook

Hi Karen,
good that we have consensus.

Dan, Guha: I think the issue of whether multi-type entities should be solved

a) at markup time or
b) in the vocabulary 

is of generic relevance - do you have an opinion on that?

I think that for types that are not disjoint but also only loosely related (like an AudioBook used as a Product), it is much cleaner and flexible to recommend using both types at markup time.

This also decouples the evolution of such needs / use cases from the evolution of the schema.org spec - site owners do not have to wait for an update to schema.org, and search engines can learn from the appearance of new patterns.

Martin

On Sep 24, 2013, at 9:07 PM, Karen Coyle wrote:

> 
> 
> On 9/24/13 11:40 AM, Martin Hepp wrote:
>> Hi Karen,
>> as already posted earlier today:
> 
>> 
>> Simply use the offers property from Product or the itemOffered property from offer and make the AudioBook (or other object) of type AudioBook AND Product.
> 
> Yes, thanks, Martin. I saw that on your reply to Dan and that seems to be exactly what we need.
> 
> kc
> 
> -- 
> Karen Coyle
> kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net
> m: 1-510-435-8234
> skype: kcoylenet
> 

--------------------------------------------------------
martin hepp
e-business & web science research group
universitaet der bundeswehr muenchen

e-mail:  hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org
phone:   +49-(0)89-6004-4217
fax:     +49-(0)89-6004-4620
www:     http://www.unibw.de/ebusiness/ (group)
         http://www.heppnetz.de/ (personal)
skype:   mfhepp 
twitter: mfhepp

Check out GoodRelations for E-Commerce on the Web of Linked Data!
=================================================================
* Project Main Page: http://purl.org/goodrelations/

Received on Wednesday, 25 September 2013 07:40:49 UTC