public-tracking@w3.org from September 2012 by date

Sunday, 30 September 2012

RE: Proposal: all exemptions to be opt-out, and identity to be declared. Fred Andrews
Re: Poll text call: final text by 28 September Nicholas Doty
Re: Poll text call: final text by 28 September Jeffrey Chester
Re: Poll text call: final text by 28 September John Simpson
RE: Proposal: all exemptions to be opt-out, and identity to be declared. Mike O'Neill
Re: drafts for publication request Aleecia M. McDonald
Re: Poll text call: final text by 28 September Aleecia M. McDonald
Re: Poll text call: final text by 28 September Aleecia M. McDonald
Re: Poll text call: final text by 28 September Aleecia M. McDonald
Re: Poll text call: final text by 28 September Aleecia M. McDonald
RE: poll text call & clarification on mkt research Fred Andrews

Saturday, 29 September 2012

Proposal: all exemptions to be opt-out, and identity to be declared. Fred Andrews
Re: Poll text call: final text by 28 September イアンフェッティ
poll text call & clarification on mkt research Jeffrey Chester
drafts for publication request Roy T. Fielding
Poll text call: final text by 28 September Kathy Joe
Re: Poll text call: final text by 28 September Justin Brookman
RE: ACTION-255: Work on financial reporting text as alternative to legal requirements Fred Andrews

Friday, 28 September 2012

Re: Poll text call: final text by 28 September John Simpson
Re: Poll text call: final text by 28 September John Simpson
Re: Poll text call: final text by 28 September David Wainberg
Re: Poll text call: final text by 28 September David Wainberg
Re: Poll text call: final text by 28 September John Simpson
Re: Poll text call: final text by 28 September David Wainberg
Log files: issue-134 Kathy Joe
Re: ACTION-255: Work on financial reporting text as alternative to legal requirements David Wainberg
Re: MRC Industry Standards for Data Retention = 1-year Joseph Lorenzo Hall
Re: MRC Industry Standards for Data Retention = 1-year Chris Mejia
Re: MRC Industry Standards for Data Retention = 1-year Chris Mejia
Re: MRC Industry Standards for Data Retention = 1-year Joseph Lorenzo Hall
Re: MRC Industry Standards for Data Retention = 1-year Ed Felten
Re: MRC Industry Standards for Data Retention = 1-year Chris Mejia
Re: MRC Industry Standards for Data Retention = 1-year Chris Mejia
Re: MRC Industry Standards for Data Retention = 1-year Jonathan Mayer
Re: MRC Industry Standards for Data Retention = 1-year Ed Felten

Thursday, 27 September 2012

MRC Industry Standards for Data Retention = 1-year Chris Mejia
Re: ACTION-255: Work on financial reporting text as alternative to legal requirements Chris Mejia
Re: ACTION-255: Work on financial reporting text as alternative to legal requirements Rigo Wenning
Re: ACTION-255: Work on financial reporting text as alternative to legal requirements Alan Chapell
RE: tracking-ISSUE-168: What is the correct way for sub-services to signal that they are taking advantage of a transferred exception? [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] Mike O'Neill
Re: ACTION-255: Work on financial reporting text as alternative to legal requirements Rigo Wenning
Re: ACTION-255: Work on financial reporting text as alternative to legal requirements Rigo Wenning
tracking-ISSUE-168: What is the correct way for sub-services to signal that they are taking advantage of a transferred exception? [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker

Wednesday, 26 September 2012

Re: ACTION-255: Work on financial reporting text as alternative to legal requirements Nicholas Doty
Interesting article John Simpson
Re: ACTION-255: Work on financial reporting text as alternative to legal requirements Alan Chapell
Re: ACTION-255: Work on financial reporting text as alternative to legal requirements rigo@w3.org
Re: ACTION-255: Work on financial reporting text as alternative to legal requirements Alan Chapell
Re: ACTION-255: Work on financial reporting text as alternative to legal requirements Rigo Wenning
Re: comments in advance of the next TCS working draft David Wainberg
Re: ACTION-255: Work on financial reporting text as alternative to legal requirements Alan Chapell
Re: ACTION-255: Work on financial reporting text as alternative to legal requirements Rigo Wenning
Re: ACTION-255: Work on financial reporting text as alternative to legal requirements Alan Chapell
ACTION-256: Propose update on security/fraud regarding deception/ad fraud David Wainberg
Re: ACTION-255: Work on financial reporting text as alternative to legal requirements Rigo Wenning
Re: tracking-ISSUE-167 (mikeo): Multiple site exceptions [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] Rigo Wenning
RE: tracking-ISSUE-167 (mikeo): Multiple site exceptions [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] Mike O'Neill
Re: tracking-ISSUE-167 (mikeo): Multiple site exceptions [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] Rigo Wenning
Re: Poll text call: final text by 28 September Aleecia M. McDonald

Tuesday, 25 September 2012

Re: Poll text call: final text by 28 September John Simpson
Poll text call: final text by 28 September Aleecia M. McDonald
Agenda for 26 September 2012 call Aleecia M. McDonald
FW: tracking-ISSUE-167 (mikeo): Multiple site exceptions [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] Mike O'Neill
RE: tracking-ISSUE-167 (mikeo): Multiple site exceptions [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] Mike O'Neill
RE: tracking-ISSUE-167 (mikeo): Multiple site exceptions [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] Mike O'Neill
Re: tracking-ISSUE-167 (mikeo): Multiple site exceptions [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] Nicholas Doty
Re: Letter to Federal Trade Commission Alan Chapell

Monday, 24 September 2012

Re: ACTION-255: Work on financial reporting text as alternative to legal requirements Nicholas Doty
Re: Letter to Federal Trade Commission John Simpson
Re: comments in advance of the next TCS working draft John Simpson
RE: definition of "unlinkable data" in the Compliance spec Bellovin, Steven M.
Re: definition of "unlinkable data" in the Compliance spec Rigo Wenning
Re: ISSUE-164 (requirements on same-party attribute): Call for text alternatives (possibly until Wednesday September 26) Vinay Goel
Re: ISSUE-164 (requirements on same-party attribute): Call for text alternatives (possibly until Wednesday September 26) Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation)
Re: ISSUE-164 (requirements on same-party attribute): Call for text alternatives (possibly until Wednesday September 26) Vinay Goel
Re: ISSUE-164 (requirements on same-party attribute): Call for text alternatives (possibly until Wednesday September 26) Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation)
Re: ACTION-255: Work on financial reporting text as alternative to legal requirements Alan Chapell
Re: definition of "unlinkable data" in the Compliance spec Ed Felten
RE: tracking-ISSUE-167 (mikeo): Multiple site exceptions [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] Mike O'Neill
RE: tracking-ISSUE-165 (mikeo): Mike O'Neill
tracking-ISSUE-167 (mikeo): Multiple site exceptions [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker
tracking-ISSUE-165 (mikeo): Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker
tracking-ISSUE-166 (mikeo): Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker

Sunday, 23 September 2012

Re: definition of "unlinkable data" in the Compliance spec Jeffrey Chester
Re: definition of "unlinkable data" in the Compliance spec Grimmelmann, James
RE: Proposed agenda for Amsterdam F2F on October 03-05, 2012 Shane Wiley
RE: definition of "unlinkable data" in the Compliance spec Shane Wiley
Re: definition of "unlinkable data" in the Compliance spec Jeffrey Chester
Re: definition of "unlinkable data" in the Compliance spec Alan Chapell
Re: Multiple First Parties Rigo Wenning
Re: definition of "unlinkable data" in the Compliance spec Jeffrey Chester
Re: definition of "unlinkable data" in the Compliance spec Rigo Wenning
Re: definition of "unlinkable data" in the Compliance spec Alan Chapell
Re: definition of "unlinkable data" in the Compliance spec Jeffrey Chester
Re: ISSUE-164 (requirements on same-party attribute): Call for text alternatives (possibly until Wednesday September 26) Rigo Wenning
RE: definition of "unlinkable data" in the Compliance spec Shane Wiley
RE: definition of "unlinkable data" in the Compliance spec Shane Wiley
Re: definition of "unlinkable data" in the Compliance spec Grimmelmann, James
Re: ISSUE-164 (requirements on same-party attribute): Call for text alternatives (possibly until Wednesday September 26) Roy T. Fielding
Re: definition of "unlinkable data" in the Compliance spec Jeffrey Chester
RE: definition of "unlinkable data" in the Compliance spec Shane Wiley
Re: definition of "unlinkable data" in the Compliance spec Jeffrey Chester
RE: definition of "unlinkable data" in the Compliance spec Shane Wiley
Re: ISSUE-164 (requirements on same-party attribute): Call for text alternatives (possibly until Wednesday September 26) Ed Felten

Saturday, 22 September 2012

Re: definition of "unlinkable data" in the Compliance spec Ed Felten
Re: definition of "unlinkable data" in the Compliance spec David Wainberg
Re: ACTION-255: Work on financial reporting text as alternative to legal requirements Jeffrey Chester
ISSUE-164 (requirements on same-party attribute): Call for text alternatives (possibly until Wednesday September 26) Matthias Schunter
tracking-ISSUE-164: To what extent should the "same-party" attribute of tracking status resource be required [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: Multiple First Parties Jeffrey Chester
Re: definition of "unlinkable data" in the Compliance spec Joseph Lorenzo Hall
RE: Multiple First Parties Shane Wiley
RE: definition of "unlinkable data" in the Compliance spec Shane Wiley
Re: Multiple First Parties Jeffrey Chester
Re: definition of "unlinkable data" in the Compliance spec Ed Felten
Re: ACTION-255: Work on financial reporting text as alternative to legal requirements Nicholas Doty

Friday, 21 September 2012

RE: definition of "unlinkable data" in the Compliance spec Shane Wiley
RE: definition of "unlinkable data" in the Compliance spec Shane Wiley
RE: definition of "unlinkable data" in the Compliance spec Rob van Eijk
RE: definition of "unlinkable data" in the Compliance spec Rob van Eijk
Re: Letter to Federal Trade Commission Alan Chapell
RE: Multiple First Parties Shane Wiley
RE: Multiple First Parties Shane Wiley
Re: Multiple First Parties Jeffrey Chester
FTC Letter John Simpson
Letter to Federal Trade Commission John Simpson
RE: Multiple First Parties Shane Wiley
Re: Multiple First Parties Lauren Gelman
RE: definition of "unlinkable data" in the Compliance spec Shane Wiley
Re: definition of "unlinkable data" in the Compliance spec Lauren Gelman
RE: definition of "unlinkable data" in the Compliance spec Shane Wiley
Re: definition of "unlinkable data" in the Compliance spec Ed Felten
Re: Multiple First Parties Jeffrey Chester
RE: Multiple First Parties Craig Spiezle
Re: Multiple First Parties Vinay Goel
RE: definition of "unlinkable data" in the Compliance spec Shane Wiley
Re: definition of "unlinkable data" in the Compliance spec Grimmelmann, James
Re: definition of "unlinkable data" in the Compliance spec Joseph Lorenzo Hall
Re: Multiple First Parties Jeffrey Chester
Proposed agenda for Amsterdam F2F on October 03-05, 2012 Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation)
Re: Multiple First Parties Rob Sherman

Thursday, 20 September 2012

Re: definition of "unlinkable data" in the Compliance spec Lauren Gelman
FYI, ad. tracking in iOS 6 David Singer
Re: Multiple First Parties Justin Brookman
RE: action-231, issue-153 requirements on other software that sets DNT headers Brendan Riordan-Butterworth
RE: Multiple First Parties Chris Pedigo
Re: Multiple First Parties Justin Brookman
Re: Multiple First Parties Jeffrey Chester
RE: Multiple First Parties Chris Pedigo
Re: Multiple First Parties Mike Zaneis
diff of TPE since last WD Roy T. Fielding
plain text of TPE spec as of 14 Sep 2012 Roy T. Fielding
plain text of compliance spec as of 14 Sep 2012 Roy T. Fielding
Re: Multiple First Parties Rob van Eijk
comments in advance of the next TCS working draft David Wainberg

Wednesday, 19 September 2012

Multiple First Parties Rob Sherman
ISSUE-163: How in the spec should we ensure user agents don't twist a user preference one way or another? (Text that biases user decisions, "express" work flows, etc). Related to outcome if ISSUE-149 and http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tracking/2012Sep/0197.html Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker
Fwd: ACTION-255: Work on financial reporting text as alternative to legal requirements Nicholas Doty
ISSUE-49 and ISSUE-137 are related Rigo Wenning
ACTION-255: Work on financial reporting text as alternative to legal requirements Alan Chapell
Re: Agenda for September 19, 2012 call Jonathan Mayer

Tuesday, 18 September 2012

Re: action-231, issue-153 requirements on other software that sets DNT headers Brendan Riordan-Butterworth

Monday, 17 September 2012

RE: action-231, issue-153 requirements on other software that sets DNT headers Brendan Riordan-Butterworth
RE: action-241: Propose changes regarding issue-116 (and also "general preference") Brendan Riordan-Butterworth

Tuesday, 18 September 2012

RE: action-231, issue-153 requirements on other software that sets DNT headers Brendan Riordan-Butterworth

Wednesday, 19 September 2012

Re: Designing privacy into the User Agent Nicholas Doty
RE: DNT:0 and API \\mike O'Neill
Re: ACTION-253 ISSUE: 119 and ACTION 208 ISSUE-148 Response signal for "not tracking" and definition for DNT:0 David Wainberg
Designing privacy into the User Agent Fred Andrews
Re: action-231, issue-153 requirements on other software that sets DNT headers Nicholas Doty

Tuesday, 18 September 2012

Re: DNT:0 and API David Singer
Re: DNT:0 and API Nicholas Doty
Re: Agenda for September 19, 2012 call David Singer
Agenda for September 19, 2012 call Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation)
Agenda for August 30, 2012 call Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation)
Re: action-241: Propose changes regarding issue-116 (and also "general preference?") Rigo Wenning
Re: ACTION-253 ISSUE: 119 and ACTION 208 ISSUE-148 Response signal for "not tracking" and definition for DNT:0 David Singer
Re: Question regarding Microsoft's DNT implementation David Singer
Re: action-241: Propose changes regarding issue-116 (and also "general preference?") David Singer
Re: action-231, issue-153 requirements on other software that sets DNT headers David Singer
RE: Action 229 - Data Append Definition Chris Pedigo
Re: Question regarding Microsoft's DNT implementation mike amundsen
Fwd: definition of "unlinkable data" in the Compliance spec Ed Felten
Re: DNT:0 and API David Singer
Re: action-241: Propose changes regarding issue-116 (and also "general preference?") Rigo Wenning
Re: action-241: Propose changes regarding issue-116 (and also "general preference?") Rigo Wenning
Re: DNT:0 and API Rigo Wenning

Monday, 17 September 2012

Sunday, 16 September 2012

Friday, 14 September 2012

Working Group Decision on Tri-part choice requirement for user agents Aleecia M. McDonald
Re: Refining the Draft Notice Roy T. Fielding
Re: Refining the Draft Notice Roy T. Fielding
Re: ISSUE-161: proposal for transparent non-compliance Roy T. Fielding
Re: ISSUE-161: proposal for transparent non-compliance Jonathan Mayer
Refining the Draft Notice Jonathan Mayer
RE: Meaning of the term "optional" in the TPE spec Mike O'Neill
Re: Meaning of the term "optional" in the TPE spec Nicholas Doty
RE: Meaning of the term "optional" in the TPE spec Mike O'Neill
Re: ACTION-253 ISSUE: 119 and ACTION 208 ISSUE-148 Response signal for "not tracking" and definition for DNT:0 David Singer
Re: ACTION-253 ISSUE: 119 and ACTION 208 ISSUE-148 Response signal for "not tracking" and definition for DNT:0 David Wainberg
Re: ACTION-253 ISSUE: 119 and ACTION 208 ISSUE-148 Response signal for "not tracking" and definition for DNT:0 David Singer

Thursday, 13 September 2012

Re: ACTION-253 ISSUE: 119 and ACTION 208 ISSUE-148 Response signal for "not tracking" and definition for DNT:0 David Wainberg
definition of "unlinkable data" in the Compliance spec Ed Felten
Re: ACTION-253 ISSUE: 119 and ACTION 208 ISSUE-148 Response signal for "not tracking" and definition for DNT:0 David Singer
RE: ACTION-253 ISSUE: 119 and ACTION 208 ISSUE-148 Response signal for "not tracking" and definition for DNT:0 Amy Colando (LCA)
Re: ISSUE-161: proposal for transparent non-compliance David Singer
Re: ACTION-253 ISSUE: 119 and ACTION 208 ISSUE-148 Response signal for "not tracking" and definition for DNT:0 David Singer
Re: ACTION-253 ISSUE: 119 and ACTION 208 ISSUE-148 Response signal for "not tracking" and definition for DNT:0 David Singer
Reminders from yesterday's call Aleecia M. McDonald
Re: Meaning of the term "optional" in the TPE spec mts-std@schunter.org
Re: Intermediaries interfering with DNT decision making Kimon Zorbas
RE: Intermediaries interfering with DNT decision making Mike O'Neill
Re: Intermediaries interfering with DNT decision making Kimon Zorbas
FW: Intermediaries interfering with DNT decision making Mike O'Neill
Re: Intermediaries interfering with DNT decision making Jonathan Mayer

Wednesday, 12 September 2012

Re: Intermediaries interfering with DNT decision making Roy T. Fielding
Re: Intermediaries interfering with DNT decision making Tamir Israel
Re: Intermediaries interfering with DNT decision making Rob van Eijk
Re: Intermediaries interfering with DNT decision making Roy T. Fielding
Re: Intermediaries interfering with DNT decision making Grimmelmann, James
Re: Intermediaries interfering with DNT decision making Rob van Eijk
Re: Intermediaries interfering with DNT decision making Roy T. Fielding
Re: ACTION-253 ISSUE: 119 and ACTION 208 ISSUE-148 Response signal for "not tracking" and definition for DNT:0 Dobbs, Brooks
Re: ACTION-252: Propose defining formerly-known-as absolutely-not-tracking via permitted uses Aleecia M. McDonald
Re: ACTION-253 ISSUE: 119 and ACTION 208 ISSUE-148 Response signal for "not tracking" and definition for DNT:0 David Wainberg
RE: Intermediaries interfering with DNT decision making Shane Wiley
Re: Intermediaries interfering with DNT decision making Grimmelmann, James
Re: Agenda for 12 September 2012 call Chris Pedigo
RE: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246: draft proposal regarding making a public compliance commitment Shane Wiley
RE: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246: draft proposal regarding making a public compliance commitment TOUBIANA, VINCENT (VINCENT)
RE: Intermediaries interfering with DNT decision making Shane Wiley
Re: Intermediaries interfering with DNT decision making Grimmelmann, James
RE: ACTION-161: work on issue-49 Shane Wiley
RE: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246: draft proposal regarding making a public compliance commitment Shane Wiley
Re: ACTION-253 ISSUE: 119 and ACTION 208 ISSUE-148 Response signal for "not tracking" and definition for DNT:0 Ed Felten
Re: ACTION-253 ISSUE: 119 and ACTION 208 ISSUE-148 Response signal for "not tracking" and definition for DNT:0 David Wainberg
Re: ACTION-161: work on issue-49 Vinay Goel
RE: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246: draft proposal regarding making a public compliance commitment TOUBIANA, VINCENT (VINCENT)
ISSUE-161: proposal for transparent non-compliance Roy T. Fielding

Tuesday, 11 September 2012

RE: action-241: Propose changes regarding issue-116 (and also "general preference") Mike O'Neill

Wednesday, 12 September 2012

Observers policy / f2f registration announcement Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation)
ACTION-161: work on issue-49 Shane Wiley
Re: ACTION-252: Propose defining formerly-known-as absolutely-not-tracking via permitted uses Roy T. Fielding
RE: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246: draft proposal regarding making a public compliance commitment Shane Wiley
Re: ACTION-253 ISSUE: 119 and ACTION 208 ISSUE-148 Response signal for "not tracking" and definition for DNT:0 Nicholas Doty
action-235 Draft middle way draft on permitted uses Nicholas Doty

Tuesday, 11 September 2012

Re: Intermediaries interfering with DNT decision making Vincent Toubiana
Re: action-241: Propose changes regarding issue-116 (and also "general preference?") Roy T. Fielding
Re: ACTION-253 ISSUE: 119 and ACTION 208 ISSUE-148 Response signal for "not tracking" and definition for DNT:0 Ed Felten
ACTION-253 ISSUE: 119 and ACTION 208 ISSUE-148 Response signal for "not tracking" and definition for DNT:0 David Wainberg
Re: Intermediaries interfering with DNT decision making Rob van Eijk
Re: Intermediaries interfering with DNT decision making Roy T. Fielding
Re: Intermediaries interfering with DNT decision making Rob van Eijk
Question regarding Microsoft's DNT implementation mike amundsen
Agenda for 12 September 2012 call Aleecia M. McDonald
Re: Intermediaries interfering with DNT decision making Roy T. Fielding
Re: Intermediaries interfering with DNT decision making Roy T. Fielding

Monday, 10 September 2012

Re: Intermediaries interfering with DNT decision making Joseph Lorenzo Hall

Tuesday, 11 September 2012

Re: Intermediaries interfering with DNT decision making Grimmelmann, James
Re: Intermediaries interfering with DNT decision making Grimmelmann, James
Re: Intermediaries interfering with DNT decision making Tamir Israel

Monday, 10 September 2012

Re: Meaning of the term "optional" in the TPE spec Roy T. Fielding
Re: Intermediaries interfering with DNT signals [was ...decision-making] Roy T. Fielding
Re: ISSUE-137 Service provider flag Roy T. Fielding
Meaning of the term "optional" in the TPE spec Matthias Schunter
ISSUE-137 Service provider flag Matthias Schunter
Re: Intermediaries interfering with DNT signals [was ...decision-making] Tamir Israel
Re: Intermediaries interfering with DNT decision making Tamir Israel
Re: ACTION-252: Propose defining formerly-known-as absolutely-not-tracking via permitted uses David Singer
Re: action-241: Propose changes regarding issue-116 (and also "general preference?") David Singer
Re: action-241: Propose changes regarding issue-116 (and also "general preference?") Rigo Wenning
ACTION-252: Propose defining formerly-known-as absolutely-not-tracking via permitted uses Nicholas Doty
action-241: Propose changes regarding issue-116 (and also "general preference?") Nicholas Doty

Sunday, 9 September 2012

Re: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246: draft proposal regarding making a public compliance commitment Rigo Wenning

Friday, 7 September 2012

Re: claim that Internet is being "radically changed" DNT Rigo Wenning
Re: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246: draft proposal regarding making a public compliance commitment Rigo Wenning
Re: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246: draft proposal regarding making a public compliance commitment Rigo Wenning
Re: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246: draft proposal regarding making a public compliance commitment Rigo Wenning
Re: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246: draft proposal regarding making a public compliance commitment David Singer
Re: claim that Internet is being "radically changed" DNT Roy T. Fielding
Re: claim that Internet is being "radically changed" DNT Jeffrey Chester
Re: claim that Internet is being "radically changed" DNT Roy T. Fielding
Re: claim that Internet is being "radically changed" DNT Dobbs, Brooks
Re: claim that Internet is being "radically changed" DNT Alan Chapell
Re: claim that Internet is being "radically changed" DNT Jeffrey Chester
Re: claim that Internet is being "radically changed" DNT Alan Chapell
Re: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246: draft proposal regarding making a public compliance commitment David Wainberg
claim that Internet is being "radically changed" DNT Jeffrey Chester
RE: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246: draft proposal regarding making a public compliance commitment Shane Wiley
Re: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246: draft proposal regarding making a public compliance commitment Alan Chapell
Interesting article John Simpson
Re: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246: draft proposal regarding making a public compliance commitment David Singer
Re: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246: draft proposal regarding making a public compliance commitment David Wainberg
Re: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246: draft proposal regarding making a public compliance commitment Aleecia M. McDonald
RE: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246: draft proposal regarding making a public compliance commitment Shane Wiley
Re: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246: draft proposal regarding making a public compliance commitment Grimmelmann, James
RE: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246: draft proposal regarding making a public compliance commitment TOUBIANA, VINCENT (VINCENT)
RE: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246: draft proposal regarding making a public compliance commitment Shane Wiley

Thursday, 6 September 2012

Re: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246: draft proposal regarding making a public compliance commitment Ed Felten
RE: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246: draft proposal regarding making a public compliance commitment Shane Wiley
Re: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246: draft proposal regarding making a public compliance commitment Rigo Wenning
Re: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246: draft proposal regarding making a public compliance commitment Rigo Wenning
Re: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246: draft proposal regarding making a public compliance commitment David Wainberg
Re: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246: draft proposal regarding making a public compliance commitment Rigo Wenning
Upcoming schedule and next steps Aleecia M. McDonald
RE: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246: draft proposal regarding making a public compliance commitment Shane Wiley
RE: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246: draft proposal regarding making a public compliance commitment Shane Wiley
Re: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246: draft proposal regarding making a public compliance commitment Rigo Wenning
Re: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246: draft proposal regarding making a public compliance commitment David Wainberg
Re: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246: draft proposal regarding making a public compliance commitment David Wainberg
Re: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246: draft proposal regarding making a public compliance commitment David Wainberg
Re: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246: draft proposal regarding making a public compliance commitment David Wainberg
Re: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246: draft proposal regarding making a public compliance commitment Rigo Wenning
Re: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246: draft proposal regarding making a public compliance commitment Aleecia M. McDonald
Re: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246: draft proposal regarding making a public compliance commitment Justin Brookman
Re: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246: draft proposal regarding making a public compliance commitment Grimmelmann, James
Re: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246: draft proposal regarding making a public compliance commitment Craig Spiezle

Wednesday, 5 September 2012

Re: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246: draft proposal regarding making a public compliance commitment David Wainberg
RE: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246: draft proposal regarding making a public compliance commitment Shane Wiley
Re: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246: draft proposal regarding making a public compliance commitment Jonathan Mayer
RE: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246: draft proposal regarding making a public compliance commitment Shane Wiley
Re: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246: draft proposal regarding making a public compliance commitment Jonathan Mayer
RE: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246: draft proposal regarding making a public compliance commitment Shane Wiley
Re: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246: draft proposal regarding making a public compliance commitment Jonathan Mayer
RE: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246: draft proposal regarding making a public compliance commitment Shane Wiley
RE: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246: draft proposal regarding making a public compliance commitment Rob van Eijk
Re: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246: draft proposal regarding making a public compliance commitment Rigo Wenning
RE: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246: draft proposal regarding making a public compliance commitment Rob van Eijk
Re: ISSUE-5: definition of tracking David Singer
RE: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246: draft proposal regarding making a public compliance commitment Shane Wiley
Re: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246: draft proposal regarding making a public compliance commitment Rigo Wenning
RE: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246: draft proposal regarding making a public compliance commitment Shane Wiley
Re: ISSUE-5: definition of tracking David Singer
Re: ISSUE-5: definition of tracking Dobbs, Brooks
Re: ISSUE-5: definition of tracking David Singer
RE: ISSUE-5: definition of tracking Shane Wiley
RE: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246: draft proposal regarding making a public compliance commitment Shane Wiley
Re: ISSUE-5: definition of tracking Rigo Wenning
Re: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246: draft proposal regarding making a public compliance commitment John Simpson
Re: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246: draft proposal regarding making a public compliance commitment John Simpson
Re: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246: draft proposal regarding making a public compliance commitment John Simpson
Re: ISSUE-5: definition of tracking Roy T. Fielding
Re: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246: draft proposal regarding making a public compliance commitment Rigo Wenning
Re: ISSUE-5: definition of tracking Dobbs, Brooks
Re: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246: draft proposal regarding making a public compliance commitment Justin Brookman
Re: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246: draft proposal regarding making a public compliance commitment Rob van Eijk
Re: ISSUE-5: definition of tracking Roy T. Fielding
Re: ISSUE-5: definition of tracking Rigo Wenning
RE: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246: draft proposal regarding making a public compliance commitment Shane Wiley
Re: ISSUE-5: definition of tracking Rigo Wenning
Re: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246: draft proposal regarding making a public compliance commitment Justin Brookman
RE: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246: draft proposal regarding making a public compliance commitment Shane Wiley
RE: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246: draft proposal regarding making a public compliance commitment Shane Wiley
RE: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246: draft proposal regarding making a public compliance commitment Shane Wiley
RE: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246: draft proposal regarding making a public compliance commitment Shane Wiley
Re: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246: draft proposal regarding making a public compliance commitment Ed Felten
Re: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246: draft proposal regarding making a public compliance commitment Justin Brookman
RE: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246: draft proposal regarding making a public compliance commitment Shane Wiley
Re: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246: draft proposal regarding making a public compliance commitment Ed Felten
RE: ISSUE-5: definition of tracking Shane Wiley
Re: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246: draft proposal regarding making a public compliance commitment Alan Chapell
RE: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246: draft proposal regarding making a public compliance commitment Shane Wiley
RE: ISSUE-5: definition of tracking Shane Wiley
RE: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246: draft proposal regarding making a public compliance commitment Shane Wiley
Re: ISSUE-5: definition of tracking Rigo Wenning
Re: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246: draft proposal regarding making a public compliance commitment Justin Brookman
Re: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246: draft proposal regarding making a public compliance commitment Aleecia M. McDonald
RE: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246: draft proposal regarding making a public compliance commitment Shane Wiley
Re: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246: draft proposal regarding making a public compliance commitment Justin Brookman
Re: ISSUE-5: definition of tracking David Singer
clarifying my status Ed Felten
Re: ISSUE-5: definition of tracking Rob van Eijk
Re: ISSUE-5: definition of tracking Roy T. Fielding
Re: ISSUE-5: definition of tracking Roy T. Fielding
ISSUE-45 ACTION-246: draft proposal regarding making a public compliance commitment David Wainberg

Tuesday, 4 September 2012

Re: ISSUE-5: definition of tracking David Singer
Re: ISSUE-5: definition of tracking John Simpson
ISSUE-5: definition of tracking Roy T. Fielding
Re: Agenda for 5 September 2012 call Aleecia M. McDonald
Re: Agenda for 5 September 2012 call Jonathan Mayer
Re: Agenda for 5 September 2012 call Jonathan Mayer
Re: Action 229 - Data Append Definition Jonathan Mayer
Re: Agenda for 5 September 2012 call Jonathan Mayer
Re: Agenda for 5 September 2012 call Aleecia M. McDonald
Action 229 - Data Append Definition Chris Pedigo
FW: Agenda for 5 September 2012 call Dobbs, Brooks
Agenda for 5 September 2012 call Aleecia M. McDonald

Last message date: Sunday, 30 September 2012 23:48:16 UTC