- From: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2012 18:04:29 +0200
- To: public-tracking@w3.org
- Cc: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, John Simpson <john@consumerwatchdog.org>, "Aleecia M. McDonald" <aleecia@aleecia.com>
Roy, whether you exclude access logs from the initial definitions or whether you cover them by permitted uses is just a matter of taste. So please do not use the definition for the access log argument. The real question on access logs is the time of non-anonymized retention. W3C anonymizes logs as a matter of policy after 6 weeks. This also helps with exuberant subpoenae. We can (and should IMHO) discuss this explicitly instead of complicating the definition. Rigo On Wednesday 05 September 2012 01:55:58 Roy T. Fielding wrote: > The effect would be that simply retaining an access log would > not count as tracking unless it was used to track. > > I also used words that align with the compliance definitions > (interaction instead of transaction) and slightly broadened what > is allowed to include session cookies (e.g., shopping carts).
Received on Wednesday, 5 September 2012 16:04:58 UTC