Re: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246: draft proposal regarding making a public compliance commitment from Rigo Wenning on 2012-09-09 (public-tracking@w3.org from September 2012)

From: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2012 15:04:35 +0200
To: public-tracking@w3.org
Cc: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
Message-ID: <1598151.hbiyeYtpX9@hegel.sophia.w3.org>

On Friday 07 September 2012 11:15:44 David Singer wrote:
> I don't mind it if the server wants to make an additional
> statement (not only do I comply with the specification, but also
> the requirements of <these jurisdiction or organizations>), but I
> am not sure I see any value in that being machine-readable, and
> it could become unmanageable.  Why is this not a matter for
> public statements, privacy policies, and so on?

+1

Received on Sunday, 9 September 2012 13:05:03 UTC