W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > September 2012

RE: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246: draft proposal regarding making a public compliance commitment

From: Rob van Eijk <rob@blaeu.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2012 23:17:50 +0200
To: <public-tracking@w3.org>
Message-ID: <57dab01bef8dc45b53f22f6a5cef8334@xs4all.nl>
Hi Shane,

If you mean the one on how to make the operational uses work in terms 
of proportinality/subsidiarity, that has been posted already.

In case you mean another conversation, please remind me offlist first.


Shane Wiley schreef op 2012-09-05 23:01:
> Rigo - Agreed there is need for more discussion of EU compliance with
> respect to DNT.  Yahoo! received one of the highest P3P compliance
> scores in some research that Lorrie Cranor's team executed a few 
> years
> ago.  Despite that review, we believe that standard to be horribly
> broken and in need of significant repair (or simply put out to
> pasture).
> Rob - I've had separate conversations with you on this topic.  Would
> you be willing to share your point of view here?
> Thank you,
> Shane
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rigo Wenning [mailto:rigo@w3.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2012 1:51 PM
> To: public-tracking@w3.org
> Cc: Shane Wiley; John Simpson; Justin Brookman
> Subject: Re: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246: draft proposal regarding making a
> public compliance commitment
> On Wednesday 05 September 2012 13:01:47 Shane Wiley wrote:
>> there are already significant issues developing and the C&S document
>> isn't addressing EU concerns directly.
> Shane, if you want to convey compliance to EU regulations, P3P is a
> better option (it has explicit semantics about that). I think that 
> is an ack of a user preference that is well defined. This user
> preference may also get some traction in the EU market (hopefully) 
> and
> serves a certain purpose there (usable consent mechanism). But I 
> don't
> think it should convey EU data protection regulation compliance. I
> think the latter would be a good topic for the DNT-NG Workshop.
> Rigo
Received on Wednesday, 5 September 2012 21:18:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:38:59 UTC